Polydopamine (PDA), which is derived from marine mussels, has excellent potential in early diagnosis of diseases and targeted drug delivery owing to its good biocompatibility, biodegradability, and photothermal conversion. However, when used as a solid nanoparticle, the application of traditional PDA is restricted because of the low drug-loading and encapsulation efficiencies of hydrophobic drugs. Nevertheless, the emergence of mesoporous materials broaden our horizon. Mesoporous polydopamine (MPDA) has the characteristics of a porous structure, simple preparation process, low cost, high specific surface area, high light-to-heat conversion efficiency, and excellent biocompatibility, and therefore has gained considerable interest. This review provides an overview of the preparation methods and the latest applications of MPDA-based nanodrug delivery systems (chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy, photothermal therapy combined with chemotherapy, photothermal therapy combined with immunotherapy, photothermal therapy combined with photodynamic/chemodynamic therapy, and cancer theranostics). This review is expected to shed light on the multi-strategy antitumor therapy applications of MPDA-based nanodrug delivery systems. Graphical Abstract

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundAt present, immunotherapy is a very promising treatment method for lung cancer patients, while the factors affecting response are still controversial. It is crucial to predict the efficacy of lung squamous carcinoma patients who received immunotherapy.MethodsIn our retrospective study, we enrolled lung squamous carcinoma patients who received immunotherapy at Beijing Chest Hospital from January 2017 to November 2021. All patients were grouped into two cohorts randomly, the training cohort (80% of the total) and the test cohort (20% of the total). The training cohort was used to build neural network models to assess the efficacy and outcome of immunotherapy in lung squamous carcinoma based on clinical information. The main outcome was the disease control rate (DCR), and then the secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 289 patients were included in this study. The DCR model had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.9526 (95%CI, 0.9088–0.9879) in internal validation and 0.9491 (95%CI, 0.8704–1.0000) in external validation. The ORR model had AUC of 0.8030 (95%CI, 0.7437–0.8545) in internal validation and 0.7040 (95%CI, 0.5457–0.8379) in external validation. The PFS model had AUC of 0.8531 (95%CI, 0.8024–0.8975) in internal validation and 0.7602 (95%CI, 0.6236–0.8733) in external validation. The OS model had AUC of 0.8006 (95%CI, 0.7995–0.8017) in internal validation and 0.7382 (95%CI, 0.7366–0.7398) in external validation.ConclusionsThe neural network models show benefits in the efficacy evaluation of immunotherapy to lung squamous carcinoma patients, especially the DCR and ORR models. In our retrospective study, we found that neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy may bring greater efficacy benefits to patients.

BackgroundRemarkably, the anti-cancer efficacy of immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has been demonstrated. However, predicting the beneficiaries of this expensive treatment is still a challenge.Materials and methodsA group of patients (N = 250) diagnosed with LUAD and receiving immunotherapy were retrospectively studied. They were randomly divided into a training dataset (80%) and a test dataset (20%). The training dataset was utilized to train neural network models to predict patients’ objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), responders (progression-free survival time > 6 months), and overall survival (OS) possibility, which were validated by both the training and test datasets and packaged into a tool later.ResultsIn the training dataset, the tool scored 0.9016 area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve on ORR judgment, 0.8570 on DCR, and 0.8395 on responder prediction. In the test dataset, the tool scored 0.8173 AUC on ORR, 0.8244 on DCR, and 0.8214 on responder determination. As for OS prediction, the tool scored 0.6627 AUC in the training dataset and 0.6357 in the test dataset.ConclusionsThis immunotherapy efficacy predictive tool for LUAD patients based on neural networks could predict their ORR, DCR, and responder well.