, and at 12 months Group 1A had on average lower calorie intake than the groups 2A (-781.8, CI-1472.7,-91.0, p¼0.008) and 3A (-885.8, CI-1599.3,-172.2, p ¼ 0.001). There was no correlation between calories intake and waist-hip ratio at baseline and reassessment with any of the questionnaires. BMI and percentage of body fat correlated with WOMAC, WOMAC pain, VAS and Lequesne scores at baseline and at reassessment. Only changes in BMI correlated weakly with one-year results of the WOMAC (r¼-0.172, p¼0.016), WOMAC pain (r¼-0.193, p¼0.007), LEQUESNE (r¼-0.197, p¼0.006) and SF-36-MCS (r¼0.160, p¼0.027); and with changes in WOMAC (r¼0.220, p¼0.002), WOMAC pain (r¼0.199, p¼0.006), VAS (r¼0.170, p¼0.018). Changes in porcentage of body fat did not correlate with any of the pain, function and quality of life changes. Conclusions: The multi-professional treatment improved percentage of body fat at one year. This improvement does not correlate with classes, telephone calls or improvements in pain, function and quality of life questionnaires (WOMAC, WOMAC pain, VAS, LEQUESNE and SF-36). Calorie intake improved and was influenced by telephone calls and classes one month apart, and does not correlate with changes in pain, function and quality of life. Changes in BMI correlated with changes in pain and function but not with quality of life.