Inclusive education development has objectified new tasks for teachers on the individualization of training and upbringing learners with special health needs. At the same time, significant efforts have been made by the pedagogical community to solve these tasks causing challenges for teachers, increasing the risks of inclusive education and reducing the quality of students' achievements. Studying the barriers in teachers' perceptions of the inclusive education and its principles, on the one hand, and teachers' professional difficulties in implementing inclusive practices, on the other hand, is an urgent research task that has both theoretical and practical meaning. This article is aimed at identifying and classifying professional difficulties that create social and educational barriers to the development of inclusive practices. The key research method is the pedagogical dialogue with the expert, developed by the authors of the article. The research involved 110 teachers of general education institutions of the Murmansk region. This method allowed experts to objectify the teachers' difficulties both mental and practical in relation to their implementation of inclusive educational practices. The results are presented by identifying, describing and classifying the professional difficulties of teachers in inclusive education, due to the social and educational context, as well as highlighting the contradictions in the essence of these difficulties. The research results allow predicting the risks of inclusive education in the inclusion itself, keeping the learners with special health needs within the educational activities, together with peers with healthy development, and developing the effective ways to resolve problem situations.
In this article, we explore expansions of our perspectives on pedagogical phenomena in Early Childhood Education through textual- and meta-textual encounters and open-ended dataphilosophy. This implies experimenting with our epistemic understandings of pedagogies and pedagogical research and the ontological models that we have brought to bear. The texts revolve around working doubts, development of pedagogical thoughts and research, and formation of mental images, worldviews, and values. Researchers from Russia and Norway write texts potentializing the shaping of other configurations of—and models for knowledge production—thinking, critiquing, and learning. Our aim is to explore significant conceptual frameworks needed to build up complex research perspectives and dialogic observation cultures through storying across borders.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.