The Carpathian region of Ukraine is characterised by high potential of renewable energy, in particular relating to small hydropower and geothermal energy in Ukraine. The technically feasible capacity of renewable energy of the region is 10.4% of the total capacity of Ukraine. According to the Ukraine -European Union Association Agreement, Ukraine is obliged to develop renewable energy and stimulate its growth through legislative, financial and institutional mechanisms. Therefore, it is important to use the capacity of the renewable energy sources in all regions of Ukraine. The purpose of the research is to reveal the possibilities of renewable energy development on the basis of determination of the level, prospects and tools to enhance the use of renewable energy sources in the Carpathian region of Ukraine. Results. It has been established that the Carpathian region is characterised by different levels of exploitation of renewable energy by areas and sources. In general, the share of renewable energy used in the region is low, with the exception of wood biomass, which is somewhat higher. The perspectives for increasing of the industrial energy production in the region should be based on the use of wind, solar, geothermal energy, mainly using existing oil and gas wells available in the region, and small hydropower in compliance with environmental requirements. It has been determined that the renewable energy in the Carpathian region of Ukraine grows mostly at the expense of private investments and requires incentives for its development at both the national and regional levels. Efficient use of the renewable energy in the region is impossible without a strategic approach. The structure, the objectives and the tasks of the regional renewable energy development strategies (RSDFE) are outlined in the article. Public-private partnership mechanisms, such as the energy cluster, green public procurement, auctions of projects for the construction of renewable energy objects, etc., are suggested. Conclusions. The conducted research has shown that the significant amount of unused renewable energy in the Carpathian region of Ukraine creates preconditions for active development of renewable energy, which may also become a new driver for regional development. At the same time, capacity development requires additional organisational and economic measures to be taken by the regional authorities aimed at planning and supporting renewable energy by establishing cooperation with the business environment, facilitating the implementation of renewable energy investment projects.Кравців В. С. доктор економічних наук, професор, директор, ДУ «Інститут регіональних досліджень імені М. І. Долішнього НАН України», Львів, Україна Жук П. В. кандидат економічних наук, провідний науковий співробітник, відділ регіональної екологічної політики та природокористування, ДУ «Інститут регіональних досліджень імені М. І. Долішнього НАН України», Львів, Україна Башинська Ю. І. кандидат економічних наук, молодший науковий співробітник, відділ регіонально...

The article proves that an isolated, non-systemic approach to the analysis of potential sales markets when justifying production placement may not give the right result, since the spot will not be guaranteed to be the best for placement, because even in simple situations there are many other options for targeting sales markets when justifying placement production. It determines that with a systemic approach, variants of combinations of locally optimal production sites, the total production capacity of which is equal to the general (systemic) demand, will be compared. For each attractive place of production, a locally optimal place of production is determined from the list of existing attractive places of production. The article emphasizes that locally optimal locations cannot be directly compared with each other, as their choice is determined by orientation on different potential sales markets. With three potential sales markets, there will be 5 options for combinations of locally optimal locations (1 option, which involves placing production in three spots, 1 option involving the placement of production in one spot, 3 options involving the placement of production in two spots), which form competing variants of systemically optimal spots for the placement of production. The application of the proposed systemic approach to the justification of production placement and the corresponding methodology is demonstrated on a conditional example with geographic coordinates. The systemic approach offered in the article for justifying the optimal location of the production of a single good can be adapted to a more complex or compound situation when the optimal location of the production of several goods is justified at the same time (including when one of the goods is used for the production of other goods). The most important advantage of the systemic approach is that it can be used in different branches of industry and agriculture as well.