A previously healthy 42 year-old woman presented at her family doctor after her hairdresser noticed a nodule in the left temporo-parietal area of the scalp. The mass was a firm, reddish nodule measuring approximately 3 × 2 cm. The patient was completely asymptomatic. She was referred to dermatology, and the lesion was excised. The initial pathology report showed a moderately-well differentiated adenocarcinoma. It was unclear at this time whether this was a primary lesion of the sweat gland or metastatic adenocarcinoma from another site. She was then referred to our centre for oncologic work-up.The pathology was reviewed and confirmed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (Figure 1). The tumour was formed by single tubules or complex back to back tubular structures with areas where the luminal cells showed apical snouts. The lesion filled the reticular dermis without involving the epidermis. No perineural or lymphovascular invasion was present. The resection margins were clear, with the closest margin at 2 mm. The immunohistochemistry showed positivity for CK 7, ER, PR, Androgen receptor, CDX2, Ber ep4 and EMA. It was found to be negative for High molecular weight keratin, CK 20, COX2, CDX2, TTF1, Renal cell marker, CD 117, and CEA. It was concluded that this profile was most consistent with a metastatic breast carcinoma; however an eccrine/apocrine carcinoma of the skin could not be completely ruled out.On physical examination, there was no palpable lymphadenopathy of the neck, supraclavicular or infraclavicular regions bilaterally. No pre-or postauricular lymphadenopathy. On the left temporal parietal scalp, there was a 3 cm, well-healed scar, with no signs of infection or IntroductionPrimary cutaneous apocrine carcinoma (PCAC) is a rare type of sweat gland neoplasm with incidence rates estimated to range from 0.0049-0.0173 per 100,000 patients per year [1]. Approximately 200 total cases are reported in the literature. PCAC occurs in areas with large numbers of apocrine glands [2]. The scalp is among one of the rarest sites of occurrence, while the axilla appears most commonly [3]. Among the 186 cases reviewed by Hollowell, equal distribution was present in both males and females, with 76% of the sample population of Caucasian ethnicity. Median age was calculated at 67 years for this sample, which is the largest cohort studied to date [1].PCAC can develop in the dermal and subcutaneous layers of the skin, occasionally infiltrating the epidermal layer resulting in ulceration. PCAC has a diverse presentation, occurring as both uniand multi-nodular growths with varying colour [2]. Often these neoplasms are indurated, painless masses and can be associated with benign lesions [2], including a nevus sebaceous, most commonly seen with scalp lesions [4][5][6]. Development of these lesions typically occurs within a year before diagnosis [7]; however several cases have reported longer durations with a period of rapid growth [4,5,8,9]. PCAC is often quite difficult to differentiate from metastases of adenocarcinoma o...
Background:The Ontario Breast Screening Program was expanded in 2011 to offer annual MRI and mammography to women with high-risk genetic mutations (e.g., BRCA1/2) and women with strong family histories and ≥25% estimated lifetime risk of breast cancer. Data to support high-risk screening is less clear in the nonmutation carrier group, as MRI has lower specificity among this population. The potential unintended consequences may be considerable and need to be explored. We aimed to describe the frequency of abnormal screens and biopsies.Methods: Demographic surveys and chart review consent were sent to a sample of 441 individuals enrolled in a high-risk screening program at two tertiary care hospitals in Toronto, Ontario. Retrospective cross-sectional chart review was undertaken for clinicopathologic data. The frequencies of abnormal screens and biopsies were calculated.Results: One hundred sixty-nine nonmutation carriers were included. The majority were white, employed, and highly educated. The median International Breast Cancer Intervention Study lifetime risk of breast cancer was 28.0% (range 24.5%-89.0%). 108 individuals (64%) experienced at least 1 abnormal screen and 13 (8%) had 3 or more over a median 3 years of screening (range 1-6 years). Of 55 biopsies, 3 (5.5%) were malignant. The cancer detection rate was 8.4/1000 screens (95% CI 3.2-22.4).Conclusions: An MRI-based screening program for nonmutation carriers was effective at diagnosing breast cancer. However, this population experienced a high rate of abnormal screens and intervention. Further research is needed to improve the performance of MRI-based screening in these women.
Background: Rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) are increasing among women with unilateral breast cancer despite low rates of contralateral recurrence and lack of survival benefit. We aimed to investigate the decisional needs and supports required to ensure adequate and quality decision-making by patients with breast cancer facing the decision regarding CPM. Methods:In this qualitative study, we used semistructured interviews developed with the use of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework to investigate the decisional needs and supports of women (aged > 18 yr) with nonhereditary breast cancer who had previously discussed CPM with their care provider. Patients were recruited from 2 academic cancer centres in Toronto, Ontario. Interviews were conducted between June 2016 and October 2017. We analyzed responses to the open-ended questions iteratively and inductively to establish major themes within the results.Results: Ten patients were recruited. Eight patients reported having initiated the discussion about CPM. Although most patients reported feeling supported, 6 mentioned some degree of decisional conflict. Cancer risk reduction was the most commonly reported perceived benefit of CPM (9 patients), followed by improved psychologic well-being (7). Most patients (8) did not mention the lack of survival benefit of CPM as a disadvantage of the procedure. Patients indicated that information resources (in 8 cases) and improved counselling from their health care team (in 7) would assist in decision-making. Conclusion:Our findings illustrate the disconnect between true and perceived risks (i.e., surgical risk) and benefits (potential recurrence and survival benefit) of CPM, which is not being managed adequately despite support from the health care team. A decision aid may address unmet patient need by providing a reliable resource regarding the benefits and risks of this procedure, while helping patients understand their values and realign their expectations. Contexte :Les taux de mastectomie prophylactique controlatérale (MPC) sont en hausse chez les femmes atteintes d'un cancer du sein unilatéral, malgré les faibles taux de récidive controlatérale et l'absence d'avantage sur le plan de la survie. Notre objectif consistait à étudier les outils décisionnels et les mesures de soutien nécessaires pour permettre à ces patientes de prendre des décisions adéquates relativement à la MPC.Méthodes : Dans cette étude qualitative, nous avons eu recours à des entretiens semistructurés élaborés à l'aide du Modèle d'aide à la décision d'Ottawa pour analyser les outils décisionnels et les mesures de soutien nécessaires aux femmes (âgées de plus de 18 ans) atteintes d'un cancer du sein non héréditaire ayant déjà discuté de la MPC avec leur prestataire de soins. Les patientes ont été recrutées dans 2 centres universitaires de cancérologie à Toronto, en Ontario. Les entretiens ont été réalisés entre juin 2016 et octobre 2017. Nous avons analysé les réponses aux questions ouvertes de manière itérative et inductive afin d'ét...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.