BackgroundIdentifying patients with BRCA mutations is clinically important to inform on the potential response to treatment and for risk management of patients and their relatives. However, traditional referral routes may not meet clinical needs, and therefore, mainstreaming cancer genetics has been shown to be effective in some high-income and high health-literacy settings. To date, no study has reported on the feasibility of mainstreaming in low-income and middle-income settings, where the service considerations and health literacy could detrimentally affect the feasibility of mainstreaming.MethodsThe Mainstreaming Genetic Counselling for Ovarian Cancer Patients (MaGiC) study is a prospective, two-arm observational study comparing oncologist-led and genetics-led counselling. This study included 790 multiethnic patients with ovarian cancer from 23 sites in Malaysia. We compared the impact of different method of delivery of genetic counselling on the uptake of genetic testing and assessed the feasibility, knowledge and satisfaction of patients with ovarian cancer.ResultsOncologists were satisfied with the mainstreaming experience, with 95% indicating a desire to incorporate testing into their clinical practice. The uptake of genetic testing was similar in the mainstreaming and genetics arm (80% and 79%, respectively). Patient satisfaction was high, whereas decision conflict and psychological impact were low in both arms of the study. Notably, decisional conflict, although lower than threshold, was higher for the mainstreaming group compared with the genetics arm. Overall, 13.5% of patients had a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2, and there was no difference between psychosocial measures for carriers in both arms.ConclusionThe MaGiC study demonstrates that mainstreaming cancer genetics is feasible in low-resource and middle-resource Asian setting and increased coverage for genetic testing.

No abstract

This study prioritises the lean, agile, resilient and green (LARG) supply chain practices in Pakistan’s FMCG sector. This study utilises the AHP methodology to rank the different LARG practices in Pakistan’s FMCG sector. The primary purpose of this analytical study is to recognise and prioritise the usage of these practices to develop the LARG paradigm in the FMCG sector. In this study, various methods have been identified with the help of extensive literature review and discussion with subject matter experts. The results demonstrate that an organisational structure (infrastructure) that can deal with disruption is one of the most critical practices among all LARG practices. The result also indicates that firms should establish resilience in their supply chain network, and is described as the most vital supply chain phenomenon among the LARG category. The study findings provide the direction to the supply chain professional as to which practices are critical for establishing the LARG system in the organisation. Prioritising LARG practices is scant in literature; hence, this study contributes. Also, other recent multi-criteria assessment tools may be used for significant contributions in the future.

Laparoscopic management in patients on peritoneal dialysis offers good postoperative outcome and early resumption to peritoneal dialysis. This is a report of a 43-year-old woman with end-stage kidney disease on peritoneal dialysis presented with left iliac fossa pain due to a large endometrioma. Emergency diagnostic laparoscopy was performed with careful laparoscopic entry, Tenckhoff catheter care and anti-adhesive application. The patient underwent temporary hemodialysis for two weeks before full resumption to peritoneal dialysis. She was planned for GnRH analogue for three months post-operatively. In conclusion, laparoscopy is a safe and advantageous route of surgery for ovarian endometrioma in patients on peritoneal dialysis. However, mindful surgical strategies are needed to ensure the Tenckhoff catheter’s longevity and early resumption to peritoneal dialysis post-operatively.

No abstract