Over 10% of COVID-19 convalescents report post-COVID-19 complications, namely, ‘long COVID’ or ‘post-COVID syndrome,’ including a number of neuro-psychiatric symptoms. The pathophysiology of COVID-19 in the central nervous system is poorly understood but may represent post-COVID injury, ongoing sterile maladaptive inflammation, or SARS-CoV-2 persistence. We describe a long COVID patient with SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the cerebrospinal fluid, which seems important, specifically due to recent reports of gray matter volume loss in COVID-19 patients. Further studies of SARS-CoV2 RNA, markers of inflammation, and neuronal damage in the CSF of patients with long COVID would be useful and should address whether the CNS can serve as a reservoir of SARS-CoV-2, clarify the pathway by which COVID-19 contributes to CNS dysfunction, and how best to therapeutically address it.
Because local anesthetics are known to inhibit both sodium and potassium channels, and anesthetic properties have been attributed to the former effect, we compared their effects with those of tetrodotoxin (TTX), a selective Na(+) channel inhibitor with anesthetic activity, and 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), a selective potassium channel blocker with convulsive activity, on transmitter release during rest and in response to field (axonal) stimulation using the microvolume perfusion method and isolated prefrontal cortex and spinal cord slice preparations loaded with the radioactive transmitters [(3)H]dopamine ([(3)H]DA) and [(3)H]noradrenaline ([(3)H]NA). It is also known that local anesthetics may exert analgesic effect and, rarely, some adverse effects on the central nervous system (CNS). Neurochemical evidence demonstrated that local anesthetics administered at concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 5mM, which might have been intentionally or accidentally achieved in clinical practice (e.g., during spinal and epidural anesthesia or peripheral nerve block), led to presynaptic failures during neurochemical transmission, including inhibited transmitter release associated with axonal firing and markedly enhanced extraneuronal concentrations of transmitters due to increased resting, [Ca(2+)]o-independent release. Tetrodotoxin, a toxin with selective Na(+) channel-blocking properties, inhibited the stimulation-evoked release but failed to affect the resting release. In contrast, the potassium channel inhibitor 4-AP enhanced both the resting- and action potential-evoked transmitter releases. It is concluded that effects of local anesthetics on resting catecholamine release in the spinal cord may contribute to their action during neuropathic pain relief and spinal analgesia as well as to their side effects in the CNS.
We measured the ex vivo uptake and release of [H]noradrenaline ([H]NA) from perfused rat spinal cord slice preparations at 1, 3 and 14days after unilateral hemisection-induced spinal cord injury (SCI) compared with control slice preparations. After surgical hemisection under anaesthesia, the rats showed characteristic signs of hemiplegia, with no movement of the ipsilateral hindlimb. After 3days, the electron microscopy images showed overall degeneration of neuronal organelles and the myelin sheath, but the synapses seemed to be intact. In ex vivo experiments, the spinal cord injury did not influence uptake but increased [H]NA release at rest and in response to axonal stimulation. The effect of a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, nisoxetine, was studied to identify the mechanisms underlying the increase in NA release. Nisoxetine potentiated stimulation-evoked [H]NA release from the non-injured tissue, but it gradually lost its effectiveness after injury, depending on the time (1 and 3days) elapsed after hemisection, indicating that the noradrenaline transporter binding sites of the terminals become impaired after decentralisation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.