“…In mineralogy, trigonal sapphire is regarded as a noncleaving crystal with reference to ideally cleaving materials as, e.g., rock salt (halite, cubic NaCl) or calcite (trigonal CaCO 3 ). Sapphire, however, does not show macroscopic cleavage, but exhibits an extreme anisotropy of its specific fracture energy (and of the critical stress intensity K Ic ) with lowest values for three almost orthogonal to each other {1012} planes [3][4][5] , confirmed also on dynamic impact. 6 Thus, compared with Al 2 O 3 ceramics, sapphire is subject to more intense cracking with closer spacing not only on static indentation but also on ballistic impact: High-speed records observed smaller (i.e., lighter) fragments of sapphire associated with a lower degree of projectile damage.…”