2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12633-021-01417-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

18nm n-channel and p-channel Dopingless Asymmetrical Junctionless DG-MOSFET: Low Power CMOS Based Digital and Memory Applications

Abstract: In this paper, an 18nm dopingless asymmetrical junctionless (AJ) double gate (DG) MOSFET has been designed for suppressed short channel effects (SCEs) for low power applications. A desired ON and OFF state current ratio with subthreshold performance parameters under limit, is the major focus of the proposed transistor. Different sensitivity parameters of dopingless AJ DG MOSFET such as drain extension, length of gate overlapping and oxide thickness are compared with the AJ DG MOSFET with doped channel region. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison is made between the proposed GAA NC DL NW TFET and the literature as shown in table 4. We compare the proposed device with a set of normal (without NC application) devices, including a bulk planar conventional MOSFET [26], a dopingless asymmetrical junctionless double-gate MOSFET [27], an asymmetrical junctionless double-gate MOSFET [27], a double-gate MOSFET [28], a pocket (P+) double-gate MOSFET [28] and NC devices such as a negative capacitance charge plasma nanowire FET [17], a negative capacitance dopingless FET [20], a negative capacitance core-shell dopingless nanotube TFET [18], a negative capacitance charge plasma junctionless TFET [21], a PZTbased NC-TFET [29], and a Si:HfO2-based NC-TFET [29]. Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison is made between the proposed GAA NC DL NW TFET and the literature as shown in table 4. We compare the proposed device with a set of normal (without NC application) devices, including a bulk planar conventional MOSFET [26], a dopingless asymmetrical junctionless double-gate MOSFET [27], an asymmetrical junctionless double-gate MOSFET [27], a double-gate MOSFET [28], a pocket (P+) double-gate MOSFET [28] and NC devices such as a negative capacitance charge plasma nanowire FET [17], a negative capacitance dopingless FET [20], a negative capacitance core-shell dopingless nanotube TFET [18], a negative capacitance charge plasma junctionless TFET [21], a PZTbased NC-TFET [29], and a Si:HfO2-based NC-TFET [29]. Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in leakage current is believed to be triggered by changes in process parameters. According to a previous study, the temperature can affect ionic current, causing an increase in off-state current and a decrease in the ION/IOFF current ratio, and it can also affect leakage current, causing an increase in leakage current due to the increase in heating current [15]. The process parameters employed in the design process, such as the VTH adjustment implantation, the threshold voltage (VTH) energy, the source/drain (S/D) implantation, and the S/D energy, must be optimized for a robust design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The fabrication of DG structure with perfectly aligned gate electrodes has been a critical issue in sub-100 nm regimes [18][19][20][21][22]. The effect of gate misalignment on the subthreshold characteristics and various analog/RF parameters of various junction-based and junctionless DG FETs has been presented in the literature [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. It has been shown that misalignment primarily impacts the electrostatic strength of gate electrodes in the channel region which results in degraded subthreshold performance [23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been noticed that most of these studies focusing on the effect of gate misalignment have been limited to investigating the subthreshold characteristics and/or analog/radio frequency (RF) performance parameters for different junctionless and junction-based FET structures [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. To the best of our knowledge, the impact of gate misalignment in digital/analog circuits has yet not been studied extensively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%