2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0074-6142(03)80173-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

59 Estimation of strong seismic ground motions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The ground velocity at TKT showed pulse-like motion with a large PGV of 161 cm/s during the 1995 Kobe earthquake in Japan; the pulse-like motion was caused by the directivity effect (Kamae and Irikura 1998). The ground velocity at TCU068 showed a velocity pulse with a large PGV of 400 cm/s and a long pulse width of 8 s during the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan; the velocity pulse was caused by fling-step motion (Bolt and Abrahamson 2003). These records are frequently used for building structure assessments of pulse motion (e.g., Hall et al 1995;Kalkan and Kunnath 2006).…”
Section: Horizontal Velocity Response Spectramentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The ground velocity at TKT showed pulse-like motion with a large PGV of 161 cm/s during the 1995 Kobe earthquake in Japan; the pulse-like motion was caused by the directivity effect (Kamae and Irikura 1998). The ground velocity at TCU068 showed a velocity pulse with a large PGV of 400 cm/s and a long pulse width of 8 s during the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan; the velocity pulse was caused by fling-step motion (Bolt and Abrahamson 2003). These records are frequently used for building structure assessments of pulse motion (e.g., Hall et al 1995;Kalkan and Kunnath 2006).…”
Section: Horizontal Velocity Response Spectramentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Table 1 indicates that the available prediction equations use different magnitude and distance definitions from one another and that site condition has most often been parameterized as rock or soil. We note that a number of additional prediction equations ͑not shown in Table 1͒ have been developed for frequency-dependent duration parameters evaluated from bandpassed accelerograms ͑e.g., Bolt 1973, Trifunac and Westermo 1977, Mohraz and Peng 1989 argue that an advantage of modeling duration using frequency bands is that the arrival time and duration of each separate strong-motion pulse can be evaluated, which can provide insight into source effects and energy dissipation between strong-motion pulses. However, engineering applications of duration consistently use duration parameters derived from full broadband records.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attenuation Severe damage to or collapse of some buildings; underground lines break. relationships, or "Ground Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs)", provides an efficient means for predicting the level of ground shaking and its associated uncertainty at any given site or location, as well as for use in seismic hazard analyses (Bolt and Abrahamson 2003). The value of the maximum ground motion parameters is calculated at each grid point of the study area to contour the Shake Map.…”
Section: Maximum Ground Motion Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%