2006 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference 2006
DOI: 10.1109/asscc.2006.357941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 6-b DAC and Analog DRAM for a Maskiess Lithography Interface in 90 nm CMOS

Abstract: A parallel, 12gm-pitch, low-power 6-b segmented digital-to-analog converter (DAC) array drives an array of 3gm x 3gm analog DRAM cells in a 2.5/1V 90 nm CMOS process, with an application in maskless lithography. An innovative self-calibrating compensation circuit limits the effect of charge leakage and capacitive process mismatch to less than 0.5LSB over lOOms of data hold time. A 2mm x 2mm test chip implements a mixed-signal interface with 32 DACs driving four 32 x 256 analog DRAM arrays.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to charge injection from the access transistor onto the storage node capacitor [24], [25]. This is confirmed by adding a dummy transistor between the access transistor and the storage node as shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Ndr Device Peak Current Requirementmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This is due to charge injection from the access transistor onto the storage node capacitor [24], [25]. This is confirmed by adding a dummy transistor between the access transistor and the storage node as shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Ndr Device Peak Current Requirementmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Fruitful technological advances had been made by various research teams, spanning a wide range of technical fields from system-level architecture, data compression and decompression, storage/interface circuit design, imaging strategy and optimization, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] to dynamics, control and fabrication of micromirror devices. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] Unfortunately, the university research funding dropped in a time frame of one to two years (2006)(2007), resulting in significantly slowed progress and even technological stagnation which were reflected in overall reduction of publication activity in projection maskless lithography after 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%