2003
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.26475-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Caenorhabditis elegans model of Yersinia infection: biofilm formation on a biotic surface

Abstract: To investigate Yersinia pathogenicity and the evolutionary divergence of the genus, the effect of pathogenic yersiniae on the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans was studied. Three strains of Yersinia pestis, including a strain lacking pMT1, caused blockage and death of C. elegans; one strain, lacking the haemin storage (hms) locus, caused no effect. Similarly, 15 strains of Yersinia enterocolitica caused no effect. Strains of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis showed different levels of pathogenicity. The majority… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
116
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
116
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, biofilm formation was not completely abolished in the mutant strains. In contrast, using our C. elegans model of biofilm formation on a biotic surface (Joshua et al, 2003) only the YPIII pIB1 strain of Y. pseudotuberculosis was able to form a biofilm and no difference was observed between wild-type and the rcs mutants (data not shown).…”
Section: Biofilm Formationmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, biofilm formation was not completely abolished in the mutant strains. In contrast, using our C. elegans model of biofilm formation on a biotic surface (Joshua et al, 2003) only the YPIII pIB1 strain of Y. pseudotuberculosis was able to form a biofilm and no difference was observed between wild-type and the rcs mutants (data not shown).…”
Section: Biofilm Formationmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The analysis of biofilms on a biotic surface was performed using the Caenorhabditis elegans model as previously described (Joshua et al, 2003). C. elegans were maintained on NGM agar with E. coli strain OP50 as a food source.…”
Section: Rcs Phosphorelay Of Enteropathogenic Yersiniaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Answers to these and other questions will provide important insight into the biology and evolution of the Yersinia. For example, strains of Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis that have identical hmsHFRS, hmsT, and hmsP genes differ in their biofilm phenotype in different in vitro conditions (Chain et al 2004;Darby et al 2002;Deng et al 2002;Joshua et al 2003;Parkhill et al 2001). Of greatest biological significance, Y. pseudotuberculosis can infect the flea midgut but never forms a biofilm in that environment (Erickson et al 2006).…”
Section: Gmp Concentration Is Involved In the Regulation Of Extracellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key evidence for the biofilm model of plague transmission came from in vivo studies using the rat flea X. cheopis as an infection model, in which the Y. pestis hms genes were shown to be required to produce a transmissible infection in the flea proventriculus (Hinnebusch et al 1996;Jarrett et al 2004). The first explicit statement of the plague biofilm transmission hypothesis, however, was based on the ability of Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis to form Hms-dependent biofilm on the surface of Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes, a model that may incorporate aspects of both in vitro and in vivo biofilm formation (Darby et al 2002;Joshua et al 2003). In this model, Yersinia biofilm aggregates on the mouthparts and blocks the feeding of the nematodes as they crawl across a preformed lawn of ECM-producing bacteria.…”
Section: Role Of the Hms Proteins In Producing In Vitro And In Vivo Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation