2015
DOI: 10.1080/20550324.2015.1117239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between micro- and nanocellulose-filled composite adhesives for oil paintings restoration

Abstract: Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) and microcrystals (CMC) were selected as reinforcing fillers for poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline), a water-soluble thermoplastic adhesive widely used in the restoration of oil paintings. Thin composite films containing 5, 10, and 30 wt% of CNC or CMC were produced by solution mixing and casting. UV-vis spectroscopy showed how CNC preserved the adhesive transparency even at the highest CNC content, while for CMC, a progressive loss of transparency was observed. Thermal analysis evidenced a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this was due to the strong interfacial adhesion and hydrogen bonding between NCC and the polyester matrix. The nanoscale of NCC increased the mobility and introduced a large amount of interfacial area then allowed a better reaction with the polymeric matrix chains, hence provided a more significant effect in the overall dynamic mechanical properties of composites compared to microcellulose …”
Section: Thermal Properties Of Nanocellulose Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this was due to the strong interfacial adhesion and hydrogen bonding between NCC and the polyester matrix. The nanoscale of NCC increased the mobility and introduced a large amount of interfacial area then allowed a better reaction with the polymeric matrix chains, hence provided a more significant effect in the overall dynamic mechanical properties of composites compared to microcellulose …”
Section: Thermal Properties Of Nanocellulose Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where A 1655 and A 3450 were the area of IR peak at 1655 cm 21 and 3450 cm (respective to N-acetyl and hydroxyl groups of Cs) [31]. The chemical stability of Cs/nanocellulose biocomposites were evaluated through solubility and swelling tests.…”
Section: Characterization Of Cs/nanocellulose Biocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, Cs biocomposites tend to have higher cross-linking with the addition of OPF nanocellulose compared with COM nanocellulose. This finding may be attributed to the fact that OPF nanocellulose is smaller in size as compared with COM nanocellulose which could lead to the higher surface area available for interaction with Cs matrix [21,30]. This observation suggests that OPF nanocellulose is a good candidate for producing higher degree of cross-linking in Cs biocomposites.…”
Section: Chemical Structure and Dd % Of Cs And Its Biocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extensive research has been performed on the different types of adhesives used in conservation [12][13][14][15][16]. However, there are only few studies on the specific topic of canvas consolidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%