1989
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620280807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A consistent tangent stiffness matrix for three‐dimensional non‐linear contact analysis

Abstract: SUMMARYA consistent tangent stiffness matrix for the analysis of non-linear contact problems is presented. The associated element has three or four nodes and establishes contact between three-dimensional structures like solids and shells, It accounts for the non-linear kinematics of large deformation analysis and guarantees a quadratic Convergence rate. Two formulations, the penalty method and the Lagrange multiplier method, are investigated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
5

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
41
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been observed that the local convergence properties of the Newton iteration are hard to achieve, and emphasis has been given to the use of consistent tangent stiffness matrices for nonlinear contact analysis [20,23,24].…”
Section: ~Odu~onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed that the local convergence properties of the Newton iteration are hard to achieve, and emphasis has been given to the use of consistent tangent stiffness matrices for nonlinear contact analysis [20,23,24].…”
Section: ~Odu~onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in contrast to earlier works (see for example Wriggers and Simo [8] and Parisch [9]), continuum mechanical arguments are used to derive the underlying variational formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See also the monographs by Kikuchi and Oden [4], Zhong [5] and Wriggers [6]. The popular penalty approximation and 'mixed' or 'trial-and-error' methods [7,8] appear, at first glance, suitable for many applications. But in this kind of method, the contact boundary conditions and friction laws are not satisfied accurately and it is tricky for the users to choose appropriate penalty factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%