2019
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.13790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Family of Barycentric Coordinates for Co‐Dimension 1 Manifolds with Simplicial Facets

Abstract: We construct a family of barycentric coordinates for 2D shapes including non‐convex shapes, shapes with boundaries, and skeletons. Furthermore, we extend these coordinates to 3D and arbitrary dimension. Our approach modifies the construction of the Floater‐Hormann‐Kós family of barycentric coordinates for 2D convex shapes. We show why such coordinates are restricted to convex shapes and show how to modify these coordinates to extend to discrete manifolds of co‐dimension 1 whose boundaries are composed of simpl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One inherent limitation of MLC is that they are only continuous across the boundary of the polygon and not defined outside the convex hull of the polygon. While this is sufficient for cage-based deformation, it rules out skeleton-based deformation as in [YS19]. Another limitation is the lack of smoothness at interior points, and it remains future work to find generalized barycentric coordinates that are at least C 1 at interior points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One inherent limitation of MLC is that they are only continuous across the boundary of the polygon and not defined outside the convex hull of the polygon. While this is sufficient for cage-based deformation, it rules out skeleton-based deformation as in [YS19]. Another limitation is the lack of smoothness at interior points, and it remains future work to find generalized barycentric coordinates that are at least C 1 at interior points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This family also includes mean value coordinates [Flo03, HF06], which come with the advantage of being well‐defined for non‐convex polygons and polyhedra, too [FKR05, JSW05]. Whole families of barycentric coordinates for non‐convex polygons and polyhedra were constructed by [BLTD16] and [YS19], but just like metric [MLD05], Poisson [LH13], and Gordon–Wixom coordinates [Bel06], they may take on negative values at certain v ∈ Ω. Some constructions guarantee the non‐negativity of the coordinates, but at the price of not depending smoothly on either v ∈ Ω [LKCOL07,MLS11] or the vertices v i [APH17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2D plane, the barycentric coordinates can represent the relative coordinate of a node with respect to three other nodes that are not on the same line [8]. The coordinates of the four nodes i , a , b , c are respectively represented by {} Conv  is denoted as the convex hull of a set  of nodes which is the smallest convex set containing  .…”
Section: Barycentric Coordinate Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to provide a generalized construction of GBC, F loater et al [FHK06] show that MVC belong to a unifying family of 2D GBC for convex polygons. Y an and S chaefer [YS19] present a modification of this family, which leads to GBC that support arbitrary dimensions and non‐manifold simplicial control structures, but neither allow for quad cages nor guarantee to be positive inside non‐convex shapes. Consequently, this STAR focuses on the evolution of MVC that overcome these limitations.…”
Section: Barycentric Coordinates With Explicit Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%