2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12015-017-9787-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fully-Closed and Automated Hollow Fiber Bioreactor for Clinical-Grade Manufacturing of Human Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A maximum 40-fold expansion factor (1.6·10 8 cells in total at the 250 cm 3 scale) was reported, leading to final cell densities of 6·10 4 cells cm −2 (GFP-MSCs) or 1.5·10 4 cells cm −2 (placenta MSCs). A hollow-fiber reactor resulted in an expansion factor of 6 (2.4·10 4 cells cm −2 , 3·10 8 cells total) [ 85 ], with production rates of 5·10 7 cells d −1 (for further reading, see [ 86 88 ]), whereas a 257 cm 3 fibrous-bed reactor achieved a 9-fold expansion factor (3·10 3 cells cm −2 , 9.2·10 7 cells total) [ 89 ]. Therefore, although hMSCs can be expanded in FBRs, the harvest problem remains to be addressed.…”
Section: Bioreactor Technologies For the 3d Cultivation Of Mscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A maximum 40-fold expansion factor (1.6·10 8 cells in total at the 250 cm 3 scale) was reported, leading to final cell densities of 6·10 4 cells cm −2 (GFP-MSCs) or 1.5·10 4 cells cm −2 (placenta MSCs). A hollow-fiber reactor resulted in an expansion factor of 6 (2.4·10 4 cells cm −2 , 3·10 8 cells total) [ 85 ], with production rates of 5·10 7 cells d −1 (for further reading, see [ 86 88 ]), whereas a 257 cm 3 fibrous-bed reactor achieved a 9-fold expansion factor (3·10 3 cells cm −2 , 9.2·10 7 cells total) [ 89 ]. Therefore, although hMSCs can be expanded in FBRs, the harvest problem remains to be addressed.…”
Section: Bioreactor Technologies For the 3d Cultivation Of Mscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this analysis was performed with BM-MSCs, which involve a particularly tedious and expensive collection method, other types of MSCs with less invasive collection methods, such as adipose stem cells or umbilical cord matrix/Wharton's Jelly MSCs (UCM-MSCs/WJ-MSCs), have been isolated and expanded with hPL with improvement in the proliferative potential with lower cell size while retaining potency attributes [37,38,[65][66][67]. As a xeno-free alternative, hPL has the caveats of being dependent on donor samples, high batch to batch variability, poor definition of its components and the possible transmission of viruses.…”
Section: Considerations For Model-driven Cost-effective Process Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same year, it was also reported that HPL supplemented medium could be used to isolate UCB MSCs and subsequently expand them using spinner flasks . Since the publication of these pioneering works, multiple studies have been carried out to expand MSCs from various sources using HPL supplementation in different bioreactor systems like stirred reactors of different volumes (100 ml to 50 l) and hollow fiber systems .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%