2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1679-39512010000100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A história oral na análise organizacional: a possível e promissora conversa entre a história e a administração

Abstract: ResumoNos últimos anos tem se verificado um aumento do número de publicações em estudos organizacionais que adotam metodologias mais qualitativas que quantitativas. Este crescimento justifica-se pelo fato de os pesquisadores da área considerarem mais incisivamente o caráter multidisciplinar da administração como uma ciência social aplicada, que se utiliza de diversas fontes epistemológicas. Entretanto, os teóricos da Administração sempre relegaram, ou nunca consideraram, o potencial da História para a análise … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, and unlike other management papers that discuss the method (Ichikawa & Santos, 2006;Gomes & Santana, 2010;Joaquim & Carrieri, 2018;Sacramento et al, 2017), the present article advocates for oral history as a theoretical-methodological approach or for filling the void between the method and discipline (Amado & Ferreira, 2006). With this approach, oral history research in historical organizational studies may incorporate history in a reorientationist way (Usdiken & Kieser, 2004), with greater engagement of historiographical concepts to "create more reflexive research on the organizational past that is not purely driven by organization theory but instead challenges assumptions about how we study organizations" (Decker et al, 2021, p. 14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this sense, and unlike other management papers that discuss the method (Ichikawa & Santos, 2006;Gomes & Santana, 2010;Joaquim & Carrieri, 2018;Sacramento et al, 2017), the present article advocates for oral history as a theoretical-methodological approach or for filling the void between the method and discipline (Amado & Ferreira, 2006). With this approach, oral history research in historical organizational studies may incorporate history in a reorientationist way (Usdiken & Kieser, 2004), with greater engagement of historiographical concepts to "create more reflexive research on the organizational past that is not purely driven by organization theory but instead challenges assumptions about how we study organizations" (Decker et al, 2021, p. 14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…One of the first published Brazilian papers to discuss oral history and management from a historic turn point of view is that of Gomes and Santana (2010), who present their case for oral history within a more comprehensive argument in favor of qualitative management research. The authors illustrate their point by presenting two uses of the method at the State University of Southwest Bahia (UESB): as a teaching method and as a tool for building the university's strategy.…”
Section: Uses and Abuses Of Oral History In Management Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Além disso, "o respeito pelas singularidades dos sujeitos, de suas histórias e das suas narrativas são princípios colocados para os sujeitos envolvidos desde o início do trabalho" de pesquisa (Souza, 2006, p. 145). Há um amplo esforço de se resgatar a palavra de indivíduos que, sem a mediação do pesquisador, não deixariam nenhum testemunho (Gomes & Santana, 2010). Ataíde (2006) destaca três modalidades de história oral: história oral temática, para abordar temas vividos pelo entrevistado; tradição oral, para o conhecimento da origem dos grupos éticos (Sic.)…”
Section: Concepção Do Método: Histórico E Conceituaçãounclassified