2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1154-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal study of the durability of long-lasting insecticidal nets in Zambia

Abstract: BackgroundA key goal of malaria control is to achieve universal access to, and use of, long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) among people at risk for malaria. Quantifying the number of LLINs needed to achieve and maintain universal coverage requires knowing when nets need replacement. Longitudinal studies have observed physical deterioration in LLINs well before the assumed net lifespan of 3 years. The objective of this study was to describe attrition, physical integrity and insecticide persistence of LLINs o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
72
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
10
72
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results corroborate most of the reports reported by some national programs that LLINs keep their insecticidal activity for at least three years [22]. But they go against those already obtained in Madagascar, which show that more than 75% of new Yorkool ® LN mosquito nets did not meet the limit value set by WHO [31] at the beginning of the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results corroborate most of the reports reported by some national programs that LLINs keep their insecticidal activity for at least three years [22]. But they go against those already obtained in Madagascar, which show that more than 75% of new Yorkool ® LN mosquito nets did not meet the limit value set by WHO [31] at the beginning of the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the proportion of the remaining nets that needed replacement after 18 months was not as important to suggest that the intervention would lose its impact in the second or third year of the distribution-replacement cycle [11] monitoring in our study, 56.8%, 7.8%, and 2.6% were found to be "in good condition," "damaged," and "too torn," respectively, by one year and half-use. This result contrasts with the 15%, 42.5% and 42.5% respectively "in good condition", "damaged" and "too torn", obtained after two years of use in Madagascar [31].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…The overall survivorship at each time-point was de ned as the number of enrolled LLINs still present in the households divided by the total number of enrolled LLINs. The functional survivorship was calculated at each time-point as follows: number of enrolled LLINs still present and "serviceable" (see de nition below) in the households divided by the number of LLINs still present + LLINs not present owed to attrition reasons (damaged and thrown away or LLIN used for other purposes) (Committee & Secretariat, 2013;Tan et al, 2016; WHO Malaria Policy Advisory Committee, 2013). We then calculated the median survival time, de ned as "the time point at which the estimate of functional LLIN survival crosses the 50% mark" (WHO Malaria Policy Advisory Committee, 2013) using the following formula: , where tm is the median survival time, t 1 and t 2 were the 24 and 32 month survey points (in years) and p 1 and p 2 were the functional survivorship proportions for the 24 and 32 month points, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Net durability, or the useful life of an ITN, is assumed to be 3 years in the base case scenario. In reality the lifespan of ITNs may actually be closer to two rather than 3 years [30][31][32][33]. In this case, the impact of the intervention during year three of the ITN distribution-replacement cycle could be well below that seen in years one and two and would, therefore, have a significant effect on the cost effectiveness and efficiency of these programmes.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This recommendation is based on the assumption that the useful life of an ITN is 3 years. However, in reality, the lifespan of ITNs may actually be closer to two rather than 3 years [30][31][32][33]. Because of these gaps in coverage, there are still vulnerable households who need replacement ITNs between distributions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%