A Microelectrode Array with Reproducible Performance Shows Loss of Consistency Following Functionalization with a Self-Assembled 6-Mercapto-1-hexanol Layer

Abstract

For analytical applications involving label-free biosensors and multiple measurements, i.e., across an electrode array, it is essential to develop complete sensor systems capable of functionalization and of producing highly consistent responses. To achieve this, a multi-microelectrode device bearing twenty-four equivalent 50 µm diameter Pt disc microelectrodes was designed in an integrated 3-electrode system configuration and then fabricated. Cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy were used for initial electrochemical characterization of the individual working electrodes. These confirmed the expected consistency of performance with a high degree of measurement reproducibility for each microelectrode across the array. With the aim of assessing the potential for production of an enhanced multi-electrode sensor for biomedical use, the working electrodes were then functionalized with 6-mercapto-1-hexanol (MCH). This is a well-known and commonly employed surface modification process, which involves the same principles of thiol attachment chemistry and self-assembled monolayer (SAM) formation commonly employed in the functionalization of electrodes and the formation of biosensors. Following this SAM formation, the reproducibility of the observed electrochemical signal between electrodes was seen to decrease markedly, compromising the ability to achieve consistent analytical measurements from the sensor array following this relatively simple and well-established surface modification. To successfully and consistently functionalize the sensors, it was necessary to dilute the constituent molecules by a factor of ten thousand to support adequate SAM formation on microelectrodes. The use of this multi-electrode device therefore demonstrates in a high throughput manner irreproducibility in the SAM formation process at the higher concentration, even though these electrodes are apparently functionalized simultaneously in the same film formation environment, confirming that the often seen significant electrode-to-electrode variation in label-free SAM biosensing films formed under such conditions is not likely to be due to variation in film deposition conditions, but rather kinetically controlled variation in the SAM layer formation process at these microelectrodes.

Recent Advances in Electrochemical and Optical Biosensors Designed for Detection of Interleukin 6

“…The capture antibody, immobilized through an organic linker at the Au disc electrode's surface, permits detection by increasing charge transfer resistance (R ct ). Contrary to the macro-electrode's direct relation with R ct [126,132], it was found to decrease due to an increase in effective surface area, and the linear response of the current was consistent with the results reported in [130,133,134]. In this study, the contribution of nonlinear resistance (R nl ) due to a steady current represented by R nl was also decreased to 14%.…”

“…An array of eight gold disc-shaped microelectrodes was engraved on a silicon needle with an objective of real-time in-situ monitoring of IL-6 [100] ( Figure 4A). This approach was envisioned following the development of a robust microelectrode-based electrochemical sensing platform for chemical and DNA sensing applications [124][125][126][127]. Figure 3a shows the equivalent circuit formed at the electrode-electrolyte interface.…”

Development of an Electrochemical CCL17/TARC Biosensor toward Rapid Triage and Monitoring of Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma

“…This made it possible to perform EIS measurements at OCP with theoretically equal amounts of oxidized and reduced species present before imposing the AC excitation signal. This is an approach that has been used by ourselves, , and many others previously. CV experiments were conducted between −0.4 and 0.6 V with a step of 0.01 V at scan rates of 50 mV/s.…”

A review of microfabricated electrochemical biosensors for DNA detection

“…Despite the benefits of micro-scale electrodes, challenges with measuring DNA hybridization using microelectrodes have been encountered including inconsistent SAM layer formation, with it being necessary to modify the SAM forming conditions to achieve consistent film formation on small electrodes, and difficulties associated with interpreting the impedance behavior at a DNA modified microelectrode, i.e. selecting an appropriately sized electrode and suitable equivalent circuit to fit the response (Corrigan et al, 2018;. Additionally, factors which are not normally a problem for bulk gold electrodes can present an issue for thin film devices.…”