Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium - NSS'94
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.1994.474776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Monte Carlo correction for Compton scattering effects in 3D PET brain imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is 250 times faster than most other currently available Monte Carlo PET simulations [3]- [6] and 150 times faster than our original code [9], [10]. When comparing simulated and measured data for regions where input data were accurate, a 5.5% systematic error was observed in the center of the FOV for a low-noise phantom study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is 250 times faster than most other currently available Monte Carlo PET simulations [3]- [6] and 150 times faster than our original code [9], [10]. When comparing simulated and measured data for regions where input data were accurate, a 5.5% systematic error was observed in the center of the FOV for a low-noise phantom study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Our simulation code was originally written in C-Language [9], [10]. In previous work, we streamlined the program, implemented some simple variance reduction techniques, and improved the efficiency by a factor of 24 while improving the accuracy of the program [11].…”
Section: A Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any remaining scatter and random counts are subtracted from the dataset using other techniques. 3,11 Note that Compton scatter events can account for >70% of all accepted events in a 3D-acquired whole-body clinical PET study, 12 even after energy window discrimination is applied, and so it is important that the residual scatter correction method is highly accurate in clinical PET.…”
Section: Pet Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This severely degrades image contrast and compromises quantitative accuracy. An accurate scatter correction must be employed before 3D PET can become widely accepted [3,4]. Some scatter corrections are independent of source distribution and attenuating media [5-81.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%