2012
DOI: 10.1080/0305215x.2011.607815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new hybrid method for optimal circuit design using semi-definite programming

Abstract: In this article a new method for yield optimization (design centring) is introduced. The method has a statistical-geometrical nature, hence it is called hybrid. The method exploits the semi-definite programming applications in approximating the feasible region with two bounding ellipsoids. These ellipsoids are obtained using a two phase algorithm. In the first phase, the minimum volume ellipsoid enclosing the feasible region is obtained. The largest ellipsoid that can be inscribed inside the feasible region is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the large computational effort required, in addition to the uncertainty involved in the estimation process, represents an obstacle against the statistical design centering approaches and needs some innovative treatments for such problems. The second approach is classified as a geometric approach [9,13,14,19,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. It treats the problem implicitly by finding the center of a body approximating the feasible region, with the assumption that the feasible region is bounded and convex.…”
Section: Design Centering and Yield Function Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, the large computational effort required, in addition to the uncertainty involved in the estimation process, represents an obstacle against the statistical design centering approaches and needs some innovative treatments for such problems. The second approach is classified as a geometric approach [9,13,14,19,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. It treats the problem implicitly by finding the center of a body approximating the feasible region, with the assumption that the feasible region is bounded and convex.…”
Section: Design Centering and Yield Function Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the optimization gets close to the optimum, the methods based on interpolation will be more accurate as expected. This explains why the proposed algorithm is well suited for objective functions that have some uncertainty in their values or subject to statistical variations like the yield function [19,24] given by Eqn (2). Also, the algorithm may be useful for surrogate-based system design [9][10][11].…”
Section: Model Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to its importance, system design centering has been discussed and developed by many researchers in several publications. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Generally, design centering approaches can be categorized into two main classes, namely, geometrical and statistical approaches. For geometrical approaches, the yield function is implicitly optimized by fetching the feasible region center and use it to approximate the design center.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the feasible region could be approximated by a convex body, eg, hyper-sphere, a hypercube or a hyperellipsoid, then use the center of this body as the design center. 1,[5][6][7][8][9][10]12 On the other hand, statistical approaches utilize statistical analysis approaches to explicitly optimize the yield function with no restrictions on the problem size. [1][2][3][4]11 In general, yield function value at a given nominal parameter values could be estimated by generating a set of sample points in the design parameter space using a predefined probability distribution of the system parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%