A new nickel metal organic framework (Ni-MOF) porous nanostructure as a potential novel electrochemical sensor for detecting glucose

Decarboxylation-Induced Defects in MOF-Derived Ni@C Catalysts for Efficient Chemoselective Hydrogenation of Nitrocyclohexane to Cyclohexanone Oxime

“…The wavenumber separation between the two vibrations indicates that the −COO groups coordinate with Ni in a bidentate mode. Furthermore, the two bands at 1556 and 1454 cm –1 are ascribed to the O–H in the carboxylic group and the C–H of the ring structure, respectively, suggesting the presence of uncoordinated carboxylic groups . Meanwhile, the bands at 1100 cm –1 and the region of 954–730 cm –1 are attributed to the C–C bond stretching vibration peaks and the C–H bond deformation vibration peaks in the benzene ring, respectively .…”

On the role of graphene oxide in bifunctional Ni/MOF/rGO composites in electrochemical nitrate detection and oxygen evolution reaction

“…The second advantage of GO and rGO is their higher surface area, which enhances the quantity of electron transfer during chemical reactions. 54,56,[98][99][100][101] The technique proposed here offers a great deal of potential for electrocatalysis, given the enormous variety of MOFs and the degree to which they may be tailored, and our research team is currently doing investigations along these lines.…”

Current trends in the synthesis, characterization and application of metal-organic frameworks

“…As the single-crystal MOF host adsorbed target analyte guests from the environment, its dielectric properties changed and caused the reflection spectrum derived from the FPI device to shift. 227 In a study by Zeraati et al , 228 a Ni-MOF-based novel electrochemical sensor was synthesized with a high surface area of 1381 m 2 g −1 , significant porosity of 1.14–9.6 nm and average particle size of 80 nm for detection of glucose. The linear range, detection limit, and sensitivity of the developed electrode toward glucose were 1–1600 μM, 0.76 μM (S/N = 3) and 2859.95 μA mM −1 cm −2 ( R 2 = 0.9966), respectively.…”