2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11063-020-10321-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Solution of Using Deep Learning for White Blood Cells Classification: Enhanced Loss Function with Regularization and Weighted Loss (ELFRWL)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our proposed model achieved higher performance than those reported by Abou et al [33], Baydilli [44], Banik et al [47], Huang et al [39], Jiang et al [37], Kutlu et al [49], Liang et al [50], Özyurt [42], Patil et al [43], Togacar et al [34], Wang et al [35], Yao et al [38], and Yu et al [51], who reported accuracy between 83% and 98%. However, it should be noted that the average performance of our proposal was lower than those reported by Baghel et al [45] and Basnet et al [36], where they have included image processing for feature extraction to enhance the prediction performance. Likewise, the works of Çınar et al [23], Hedge et al [48], and Khan et al [40] have reported accuracy values higher than 99%.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our proposed model achieved higher performance than those reported by Abou et al [33], Baydilli [44], Banik et al [47], Huang et al [39], Jiang et al [37], Kutlu et al [49], Liang et al [50], Özyurt [42], Patil et al [43], Togacar et al [34], Wang et al [35], Yao et al [38], and Yu et al [51], who reported accuracy between 83% and 98%. However, it should be noted that the average performance of our proposal was lower than those reported by Baghel et al [45] and Basnet et al [36], where they have included image processing for feature extraction to enhance the prediction performance. Likewise, the works of Çınar et al [23], Hedge et al [48], and Khan et al [40] have reported accuracy values higher than 99%.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…This form makes full use of three-dimensional hyperspectral data for WBC classification. Basnet et al [ 36 ] optimized the WBC CNN classification enhancing loss function with regularization and weighted loss, decreasing time processing. Jiang et al [ 37 ] constructed a new CNN model called WBCNet that can fully extract features of the WBC image by combining the batch normalization algorithm, residual convolution architecture, and improved activation function.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al, proposed to learn spectral and spatial features from microscopy hyperspectral images using deep convolution networks [21]. A CNN model with loss enhancement with regularization was presented that reduced the processing time [22]. Further, Jiang et al, employed residual convolution structure with batch normalization to improve activation function for enhancing feature extraction in the WBC classification [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method improves the accuracy rate and loss in both detection and classification of WBCs. The proposed system in [10] consisted of a deep neural convolution network (DCNN) enhanced with a modified loss function besides regularization. The proposed system improved the classification accuracy from 96.1% to 98.92% and a decrease in processing time from 0.354 to 0.216 s. In [11], an automatic approach for WBCs' detection and classification from peripheral blood images was proposed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic recognition of peripheral blood cells using classical machine-learning approaches has been widely treated in the literature [24,25]. With the emergence of the CNN architectures, many works have been proposed to perform the automatic segmentation and classification of the white blood cells [8][9][10]. The classification of the eight components of the peripheral blood cells was proposed in the paper [22].…”
Section: Influence Of the Training Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%