2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A real-time plant discrimination system utilising discrete reflectance spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shape features for object identification typically require invariance, which indicates that the values of the shape features will not be changed after the object is translated, rotated, rescaled, or repositioned [13]. Therefore, four kinds of features were determined in the study, including area, shape index, length/width, and length.…”
Section: Spectral Shape and Texture Feature Extraction Of Plant Objmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shape features for object identification typically require invariance, which indicates that the values of the shape features will not be changed after the object is translated, rotated, rescaled, or repositioned [13]. Therefore, four kinds of features were determined in the study, including area, shape index, length/width, and length.…”
Section: Spectral Shape and Texture Feature Extraction Of Plant Objmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to date, there are many studies on identification of weeds from crops using the sensitive spectral bands with encouraging results. However, the identification accuracy is low in cases when the spectral difference between the crop and the weed is not obvious, or the reflection of leaves is affected by factors of water content, plant disease, and growth stage [9][10][11][12][13]. Therefore, to more effectively discriminate weeds from crops, the combination of multiple features, such as the combination of shape and textural, shape and spectral, and spectral and textural features, should be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field images were captured by an integrated weed sensing system with the combination of multispectral and spatial sensors at a commercial farm in Cunderdin, Western Australia, shown in Figure 5. This hardware system, which is housed at the Electron Science Research Institute (ESRI), Edith Cowan University, Australia, consists of two components (i) a Xilinx Zynq ZC702 development board with a VITA 2000 camera sensor and (ii) a Plan Discrimination Unit (PDU) [15] based on spectral reflectance measurements. We collected a "fieldtrip_can_weeds" dataset (published online) under different weather conditions (cloudy, windy, and sunny) and illumination variations (morning and afternoon light).…”
Section: Field Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the performance of computer vision algorithms is greatly dependent on the selection of an appropriate set of features [9]. Particularly, the key characteristics of vegetation (crops and weeds), which comprise biological morphology [10][11][12], spectral features [13][14][15], spatial contexts [16][17][18] and visual textures [19][20][21] can be extracted by applying different characterization methods. Each of these characteristics has its own advantages, and depends on the complexity of the generated datasets for plant species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a number of studies assume a controlled greenhouse condition [9]. Use of different hardware setups and fundamentally different algorithms for monitoring different crop stresses is also another problem in the reported work [10], [11]. For the solution to be optimal, it should be easily adaptable in different situations with minimal changes.…”
Section: Issn: 2319 -1058mentioning
confidence: 99%