1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7358(97)00058-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Instruments for Assessing Family History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
7

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
10
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…of previous research with the original FBQ and numerous other studies (see Melchert, 1998a), negative correlations were expected (i.e., higher family of origin Junctioning was expected to be associated with lower indications of current adjustment and distress). The five outcome measures included participants' estimated levels of depression, anxiety, hostility, substance abuse, and social adjustment as assessed by the CES-D, CCAS, AQ Hostility subscale, SS[, and SAS-SR. As shown in Table 2, the correlations between these measures of adjustment and the FBQ-B subscales ranged from nonsignificant to moderately strong (in terms of the suggestions from Cohen, 1992, regarding the strength of effect sizes in which an r of .1 0 is considered small, .30 medium, and .50 large).…”
Section: Construct-related Validitymentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…of previous research with the original FBQ and numerous other studies (see Melchert, 1998a), negative correlations were expected (i.e., higher family of origin Junctioning was expected to be associated with lower indications of current adjustment and distress). The five outcome measures included participants' estimated levels of depression, anxiety, hostility, substance abuse, and social adjustment as assessed by the CES-D, CCAS, AQ Hostility subscale, SS[, and SAS-SR. As shown in Table 2, the correlations between these measures of adjustment and the FBQ-B subscales ranged from nonsignificant to moderately strong (in terms of the suggestions from Cohen, 1992, regarding the strength of effect sizes in which an r of .1 0 is considered small, .30 medium, and .50 large).…”
Section: Construct-related Validitymentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Although interview-based family history assessments are better suited for obtaining detailed and specific family history information, questionnaire methods are usually more time efficient; consequently, a variety of questionnaire instruments have been developed to assess characteristics of an individual's family of origin (for reviews, see Melchert, 1998a;Touliatos, Perlmutter, & Straus, 2001). These instruments include a broad range of variables and approaches, some focused on relatively global judgments about the qualities of respondents' family experiences (e.g., the Parental Bonding Instrument by Parker, Tupling, & Brown, 1979, includes items such as "[My parent] did not want me to grow up" and "[My parent] was overprotective of me") and others focused on relatively specific family characteristics that respondents may have had (e.g., the Schwarz-Getter Interparental Conflict Scale; Schwarz & Zuroff, 1979).…”
Section: A Brief Version Of the Family Background Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Family Background Questionnaire (FBQ): Questionnaire developed by Melchert (1998aMelchert ( , 1998b and translated into Portuguese by Falcke (2003), with the purpose of investigating family-of-origin experiences. In this study, the following subscales were used, with indication of the Cronbach's alpha obtained: physical neglect (0,776), paternal (0,861) and maternal (0,797) physical abuse, sexual abuse (0,290), psychological adjustment of fathers (0,781) and mothers (0,739), parental alliance (0,862) and paternal (0,937) and maternal (0,880) substance abuse.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family Background Questionnaire -FBQ - (Melchert, 1998a(Melchert, , 1998b: Constitui-se de um instrumento autoaplicável, com 179 questões, apresentadas com respostas no formato Likert, de cinco pontos. O total de questões compõe 22 subescalas que envolvem aspectos relacionados às recordações do sujeito acerca das experiências vivenciadas em sua família de origem.…”
Section: Instrumentosunclassified