2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A shear-lag model with a cohesive fibre–matrix interface for analysis of fibre pull-out

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deformation associated with debonding is assumed to be elastic, although some authors have noted that plastic deformation can occur for thermoplastic systems [31], potentially invalidating results. The calculation for apparent IFSS also assumes that the stress along the interface is constant, which is a simplification, as the shear-lag approach [32,33] and FEA modelling [34,35] have both shown it varies along the embedded length. A constant interfacial stress also implies that failure is more sudden, with no account for the progressive ''unzipping'' due to interfacial crack propagation.…”
Section: Microbond Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deformation associated with debonding is assumed to be elastic, although some authors have noted that plastic deformation can occur for thermoplastic systems [31], potentially invalidating results. The calculation for apparent IFSS also assumes that the stress along the interface is constant, which is a simplification, as the shear-lag approach [32,33] and FEA modelling [34,35] have both shown it varies along the embedded length. A constant interfacial stress also implies that failure is more sudden, with no account for the progressive ''unzipping'' due to interfacial crack propagation.…”
Section: Microbond Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They simulated RVE in a similar way as their previous research (Spanos et al., 2014) using a multi-scale FE approach. Chen and Yan (2015) derived the governing equations of a shear-lag model with a cohesive fiber–matrix interface by a bilinear cohesive traction–separation law to study the stress transfer between the fiber and matrix. Guo and Zhu (2015) investigated the interfacial shear stress transfer of a monolayer graphene on top of a polymer substrate subjected to uniaxial tension by a cohesive zone model integrated with a shear-lag model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element (FE) modeling is now widely used in the simulation of fiber-reinforced composites thanks to recent advancement in numerical simulation and computer software. A number of research groups have proposed a number of methods to characterize the fiber/matrix interface for use in FE modeling of fiber-reinforced composites, including the cohesive zone method (CZM), 2325 the perfect bonding method, 26,27 and the frictional contact method. 9 The FE models developed by Modniks and Andersons 26 and Modniks et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 established 3D FE models of a short glass fiber-reinforced composite using CZM to study the longitudinal and transverse tensile behavior of the composite material with different interfacial shear strength. Chen and Yan 24 introduced cohesive fiber/matrix interface into the classical SLM to analyze the stress distribution of fiber pullout and developed FE models based on CZM to simulate fiber pullout and to verify the accuracy of the refined SLM. Insofar, CZM-based FE modeling is the most effective and convenient approach to numerical simulation of the cohesive behavior of fiber/matrix interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation