“…However, this relatively active reagent could not be applied to the enantioselective Michael addition of 2a , even in the presence of the chiral ligand, under the optimized conditions because of competition from a 1,2‐addition reaction and facile aromatization to give 2,3,4‐trimethoxy‐5‐methylphenol. Although we were able to repeat the previously reported Michael reaction of 4,4‐dimethoxycyclohexa‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one by using Me 2 Zn, Cu(OTf) 2 , and chiral ligand ( S , R , R )‐ B to obtain the desired conjugate addition product ( R )‐3‐methyl‐4,4‐dimethoxycyclohex‐2‐en‐1‐one in 72 % yield with 99 % ee , the enantioselective Michael reaction of 2a was problematic, because the four electron‐donating methoxy substituents make 2a a poor Michael acceptor toward a nucleophilic reagent . The similar problem of reluctant Michael reactions of highly electron‐rich system has also been encountered by the Baran and Chen groups , …”