2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5ob00411j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A short synthesis of (±)-antroquinonol in an unusual scaffold of 4-hydroxy-2-cyclohexenone

Abstract: Antroquinonol, which was first isolated from a mushroom, Antrodia cinnamomea, found in Taiwan, is an anticancer compound with a unique core structure of 4-hydroxy-2,3-dimethoxycyclohex-2-enone carrying methyl, farnesyl and hydroxyl substituents in the 4,5-cis-5,6-trans configuration. A short synthesis of (±)-antroquinonol is accomplished in seven steps from 2,3,4-trimethoxyphenol, which is oxidized in methanol to a highly electron-rich substrate of 2,3,4,4-tetramethoxycyclohexadienone and then a Michael reacti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this relatively active reagent could not be applied to the enantioselective Michael addition of 2a , even in the presence of the chiral ligand, under the optimized conditions because of competition from a 1,2‐addition reaction and facile aromatization to give 2,3,4‐trimethoxy‐5‐methylphenol. Although we were able to repeat the previously reported Michael reaction of 4,4‐dimethoxycyclohexa‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one by using Me 2 Zn, Cu(OTf) 2 , and chiral ligand ( S , R , R )‐ B to obtain the desired conjugate addition product ( R )‐3‐methyl‐4,4‐dimethoxycyclohex‐2‐en‐1‐one in 72 % yield with 99 % ee , the enantioselective Michael reaction of 2a was problematic, because the four electron‐donating methoxy substituents make 2a a poor Michael acceptor toward a nucleophilic reagent . The similar problem of reluctant Michael reactions of highly electron‐rich system has also been encountered by the Baran and Chen groups , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, this relatively active reagent could not be applied to the enantioselective Michael addition of 2a , even in the presence of the chiral ligand, under the optimized conditions because of competition from a 1,2‐addition reaction and facile aromatization to give 2,3,4‐trimethoxy‐5‐methylphenol. Although we were able to repeat the previously reported Michael reaction of 4,4‐dimethoxycyclohexa‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one by using Me 2 Zn, Cu(OTf) 2 , and chiral ligand ( S , R , R )‐ B to obtain the desired conjugate addition product ( R )‐3‐methyl‐4,4‐dimethoxycyclohex‐2‐en‐1‐one in 72 % yield with 99 % ee , the enantioselective Michael reaction of 2a was problematic, because the four electron‐donating methoxy substituents make 2a a poor Michael acceptor toward a nucleophilic reagent . The similar problem of reluctant Michael reactions of highly electron‐rich system has also been encountered by the Baran and Chen groups , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, the ( R )‐binaphthol‐derived phosphoramidite chiral ligand ( R , S , S )‐ A , based on Feringa's protocol, was chosen for the enantioselective Michael reaction. In our previous study, MeMgBr–CuCl was determined as the best nucleophilic reagent for the conjugate addition to benzoquinone monoketal 2a in tetrahydrofuran (THF). However, this relatively active reagent could not be applied to the enantioselective Michael addition of 2a , even in the presence of the chiral ligand, under the optimized conditions because of competition from a 1,2‐addition reaction and facile aromatization to give 2,3,4‐trimethoxy‐5‐methylphenol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations