2004
DOI: 10.1306/051204740933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Universal Equation for Grain Settling Velocity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
436
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 453 publications
(438 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
436
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ESD derived from the interpolation formula (Eq. 10) (hereafter L int ) indirectly accounts for a nonspherical particle shape by adopting the coefficient values C 1 5 24 and C D 5 0.75, which produce the best fit to experimental data on sinking of slightly nonspherical particles (Ferguson and Church 2004). The resistance drag produced by particles of irregular shape, like zooplankton carcasses, is larger than that produced by a sphere.…”
Section: Results Ii: Carcass Sinking Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ESD derived from the interpolation formula (Eq. 10) (hereafter L int ) indirectly accounts for a nonspherical particle shape by adopting the coefficient values C 1 5 24 and C D 5 0.75, which produce the best fit to experimental data on sinking of slightly nonspherical particles (Ferguson and Church 2004). The resistance drag produced by particles of irregular shape, like zooplankton carcasses, is larger than that produced by a sphere.…”
Section: Results Ii: Carcass Sinking Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, for such values of Re close to unity in this case, we can no more use the Stokes drag force (valid only for Re 1 â‰Ș ) in the whole viscous regime or a constant drag coefficient (valid only for Re 1 ≫ ) in the whole inertial regime as was done in [14]. To clarify this point, we propose to connect the two limit regimes with the following empirical expression of the drag coefficient derived from [31]: With an analysis analogous to [14], the rheology obtained for dry granular flows [13] has been extended to steady granular flows down an inclined plane taking into account the influence of the interstitial fluid [15]. Specific rheological laws are achieved for the three regimes which predict in particular that the velocity profiles in both free fall and inertial limit regimes are qualitatively similar.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussion On Velocity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carcass settling velocity measurements and fresh carcass density were used to estimate carcass ESD using a modified Stokes' Law for irregularly shaped particles (Ferguson and Church 2004) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where v s is particle (carcass) settling velocity, R is submerged specific gravity [(r particle 2r fluid )/r fluid , where r is density], g is gravitational acceleration, D is particle ESD, n is fluid kinematic viscosity, and C 1 and C 2 are constants (24 and 1.2, respectively; as recommended for angular grains by Ferguson and Church [2004]). Measured values of fresh carcass density (r particle ) and settling velocity (v s ) were applied in Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%