2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-019-0719-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single bacterium restores the microbiome dysbiosis to protect bones from destruction in a rat model of rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract: Background Early treatment is key for optimizing the therapeutic success of drugs, and the current initiating treatment that blocks the progression of bone destruction during the pre-arthritic stages remains unsatisfactory. The microbial disorder in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is significantly reversed with effective treatment. Modulating aberrant gut microbiomes into a healthy state is a potential therapeutic approach for preventing bone damage. Results By using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
80
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The universally present species were Streptococcus thermophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis instead of commonly tested probiotics from Lactobacillus . An orally administered strain of B. longum has been shown to persist in 30% of individuals for at least 6 months 87 , while we failed to detect in feces an L. casei strain gavaged to rats 88, 89 , suggesting general differences between Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus . The strains used by Zmora et al included a number of Lactobacillus , Bifidobacterium , as well as Streptococcus and Lactococcus , all detectable in various gastrointestinal sites despite laxative and colonoscopy 11 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…The universally present species were Streptococcus thermophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis instead of commonly tested probiotics from Lactobacillus . An orally administered strain of B. longum has been shown to persist in 30% of individuals for at least 6 months 87 , while we failed to detect in feces an L. casei strain gavaged to rats 88, 89 , suggesting general differences between Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus . The strains used by Zmora et al included a number of Lactobacillus , Bifidobacterium , as well as Streptococcus and Lactococcus , all detectable in various gastrointestinal sites despite laxative and colonoscopy 11 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…It is now clear that changes in the gut microbiota can impact bone density and health . For example, intestinal infection with pathogenic bacteria can induce bone loss in male mice .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(49) It is now clear that changes in the gut microbiota can impact bone density and health. (50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69) For example, intestinal infection with pathogenic bacteria can induce bone loss in male mice. (70) In contrast, treatment with beneficial bacteria (probiotics) alters gut microbiota composition (50,(53)(54)(55)57,(71)(72)(73)(74) and enhances bone density in healthy male mice, (53) post-antibiotic treated male mice, (68) ovariectomized mice, (50,54,55) inflamed intact female mice, (75) and type 1 diabetic male mice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the two new RA dental markers appeared more abundant in control saliva samples. The strongest marker from healthy saliva remained Lactococcus lactis 5 , and Lactobacillus paracasei, Streptococcus infantarius, w ere identified, reminiscent of beneficial effects of L. casei gavage in rat model of RA 42, 43 . The assembled genomes allowed matching of different species in the Veillonella genus as RA saliva markers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%