2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21524-2_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sub-GHz Multi-ISM-Band ZigBee Receiver Using Function-Reuse and Gain-Boosted N-Path Techniques for IoT Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this receiver implementation, the LO phase noise is traded for low power consumption. On the other hand, the achieved noise figure of 9 dB for a −20-dBm blocker located 40-MHz offset is competitive with the reported performance of other state-of-the-art low-power RXs-a 13.7-dB NF for a −20-dBm blocker at a 50-MHz offset [33] and an 18-dB NF for a −10-dBm blocker at a 400-MHz offset [17]. In addition, the targeted IoT standards, such as Bluetooth and NB-IoT, expect their receivers to tolerate −27-dBm/−30-dBm blocker at 80-/60-MHz offset.…”
Section: Blocker Noise Figurementioning
confidence: 62%
“…In this receiver implementation, the LO phase noise is traded for low power consumption. On the other hand, the achieved noise figure of 9 dB for a −20-dBm blocker located 40-MHz offset is competitive with the reported performance of other state-of-the-art low-power RXs-a 13.7-dB NF for a −20-dBm blocker at a 50-MHz offset [33] and an 18-dB NF for a −10-dBm blocker at a 400-MHz offset [17]. In addition, the targeted IoT standards, such as Bluetooth and NB-IoT, expect their receivers to tolerate −27-dBm/−30-dBm blocker at 80-/60-MHz offset.…”
Section: Blocker Noise Figurementioning
confidence: 62%
“…On the other hand, the achieved blocker NF of 10 dB for a −15 dBm blocker is competitive with other sub-mW RF front-ends. For example, the 1.15 mW RX, reported in [24], achieves a blocker NF of 13.7 dB for a −20 dBm blocker located at 50 MHz offset.…”
Section: Blocker Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low power CMOS receivers typically employ high-Q external filters (e.g., SAW, FBAR) or off-chip and on-chip LC resonant tanks to attenuate the blockers and improve their OOB selectivity [17]- [23]. Recently N-path filters and feedback cancellations [24], [25] are adopted to improve the RF filtering and enhance the linearity performance of the RX. With power consumption ≤ 5 mW, these RXs exhibit OOB IIP3 between -20 and 0 dBm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such cells also exhibit a high NF and insufficient linearity owing to the limited linearity of the active mixer and lack of RF filtering. A receiver architecture employing a function-reuse RF front-end and a CR VCO-filter cell has been proposed [7]; however, the NF of this architecture is also relatively high, and the in-band input 1-dB compression point is -50 dBm because of the low supply voltage of 0.5 V. Low-power receiver architectures in which the dc bias current of an RF LNTA and baseband (BB) stage is shared were also developed [8]- [11]. An RF-to-BB-CR receiver incorporating an RF bandpass filter with an eight-path passive mixer was proposed [8] to improve the linearity of the architecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%