2014
DOI: 10.1097/pat.0000000000000148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of Australian haematology reference intervals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defining internal laboratory RIs is a demanding procedure in terms of both time and resources. Thus, many routine laboratories preferably use externally derived RIs, although such approach might be associated with errors and misinterpretation of the obtained laboratory results (4,11,12). Recommendations of CLSI and IFCC strongly support development of internal RIs and more recently, an easier and less consumable indirect method was proposed (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Defining internal laboratory RIs is a demanding procedure in terms of both time and resources. Thus, many routine laboratories preferably use externally derived RIs, although such approach might be associated with errors and misinterpretation of the obtained laboratory results (4,11,12). Recommendations of CLSI and IFCC strongly support development of internal RIs and more recently, an easier and less consumable indirect method was proposed (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive survey of procedures that are used to define RIs in laboratory haematology has not been performed in Serbia. Nonetheless, a similar analysis conducted in Australia could provide a general insight into the status of RIs for haematological parameters (4). Namely, the authors reported that up to 77% of involved laboratories use RIs adopted from other laboratories, textbooks or scientific papers, instead of determination of their own RIs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, despite these facts and requirements, attempts to establish specific RIs for haematology parameters are still uncommon and are applied to insufficient sample sizes. There have been a limited number of attempts ( 6 , 9 , 10 ) to conduct appropriate multicentre studies to achieve this goal, because with the exception of the concentration of haemoglobin, there are no standard reference materials; native samples must be measured fresh and cannot be measured or re-analysed after storage ( 9 ). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a group size of less than 120 people and an abnormal distribution of laboratory parameters, a calculation is used, according to which 90% of healthy people show "normal" laboratory parameters and 10% of healthy people -"abnormal". With a group size of more than 120 people and a normal distribution of laboratory parameters, use the calculation of reference intervals in the form of Xsr ± 1.96SD, according to which 95% of healthy people are found to have "normal" laboratory parameters and 5% of healthy people are "abnormal" [7,8,9]. Reference limits are determined by factors of interindividual biological variation with respect to analytical (1) The established reference intervals for blood parameters are assumed to be multivariate, obtained by the combined processing of several laboratory parameters in the same group under the assumption of a normal distribution of indicators.…”
Section: Reference Intervals and Their Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%