1998
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified method for 2-D and 3-D refraction statics

Abstract: Most of the seismic data processing procedures are divided into 2-D, 2.5-D, crooked lines or 3-D versions dictated by the differences in the shot and receiver configurations. In this paper, we introduce a tomographic approach that overcomes these geometrical difficulties and provides stable statics solutions from picked first-break times. We also show that the first-break picks contain both the short and the long wavelength surface statics. The solutions are obtained by solving a set of generalized surface-con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…weathering layer, loose sediments or volcanic stockworks) often produce velocity variations that can affect the arrival time of the energy to the recording geophones, especially in onshore data (Taner et al, 1998;Tryggvason et al, 2009). These areas are usually heterogeneously distributed and commonly feature low propagation velocities.…”
Section: Static Corrections Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…weathering layer, loose sediments or volcanic stockworks) often produce velocity variations that can affect the arrival time of the energy to the recording geophones, especially in onshore data (Taner et al, 1998;Tryggvason et al, 2009). These areas are usually heterogeneously distributed and commonly feature low propagation velocities.…”
Section: Static Corrections Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The refraction statics is computed tomographically (Taner, 1994) with the FOCUS (Cogniseis) software. There are four steps: (1) Pick first arrival times from shot gathers; (2) Assign refractors; (3) Solve for refraction statics; (4) Apply refraction statics correction to data.…”
Section: Refraction Staticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, joint interpretation of refraction and reflection seismic data from the near-surface can have many benefits. Numerous sophisticated interpretation techniques of refraction seismic data and tomographic inversion schemes on how to better image the near-surface have been extensively discussed in the geophysical literature (e.g., Hampson and Russell, 1984;Lines and Treitel, 1984;Marsden, 1993;Macrides and Dennis, 1994;Belfer and Landa, 1996;Lanz et al, 1998;Taner et al, 1998;Marti et al, 2002;Bergman et al, 2004). In this study, traveltime inversion techniques based on the generalized linear inversion (GLI) method proposed by Hampson and Russell (1984) have been used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%