2001
DOI: 10.1109/10.914793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A wavelet-based continuous classification scheme for multifunction myoelectric control

Abstract: This work represents an ongoing investigation of dexterous and natural control of powered upper limbs using the myoelectric signal. When approached as a pattern recognition problem, the success of a myoelectric control scheme depends largely on the classification accuracy. A novel approach is described that demonstrates greater accuracy than in previous work. Fundamental to the success of this method is the use of a wavelet-based feature set, reduced in dimension by principal components analysis. Further, it i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
342
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 613 publications
(375 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
10
342
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the system was validated in off-line mode, the required time for recording and processing the raw sEMG signals is lower than 300 ms, which agrees with the criteria reported in Englehart et al (2001) to be used in real time application. A comparison of our technique with previous works can be unbalanced because of the difference in number of electrodes and muscles selected, number of classes, whether amputees were included in the study and the kind of gestures used in relation to the level of dexterity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Despite the system was validated in off-line mode, the required time for recording and processing the raw sEMG signals is lower than 300 ms, which agrees with the criteria reported in Englehart et al (2001) to be used in real time application. A comparison of our technique with previous works can be unbalanced because of the difference in number of electrodes and muscles selected, number of classes, whether amputees were included in the study and the kind of gestures used in relation to the level of dexterity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Each gesture was randomly repeated 10 times and recorded for 2 s. We empirically determined the best gesture duration by means of preliminary studies. Since steady-state sEMG signal are more robust than transient signal for classification purposes [19,23] repeated 10 times, a [10 × 5 × L × N] dataset matrix (from now on, we refer to it as "data") was collected for each subject. An example of raw data acquired on a whole registration session is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Experimental Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the wide variety of preprocessing EMG classification techniques being investigated [18][19][20], we chose to analyze PCA, the widely commonly used technique, and CSP, which has shown interesting potentialities in EMG pattern recognition [14]. We investigated the performances of the two approaches by using 32 combinations of features (feature vectors) and 3 different classifiers: linear discriminant analysis (LDA, linear classifier), support vector machines (SVM, non-linear kernel classifier) and artificial neural networks (ANN, non-linear classifier).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (5), we set T = 0.5 ms, T w = 128 ms, T d = 32 ms in our experiments. The selection of these parameters is weighted in [27,28]. The sampled sEMG data with respect to each patient are respectively segmented to form overlapping data sequences for healthy and diseased sides.…”
Section: Results Based On Feature Matrices and Clustering Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%