2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90092-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessing Information with Tags: Search and Ranking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For examples of research using network tag analysis, see Ahmed and Lugovic (2019), Buarki and Alkhateeb (2018), Ewbank (2015). For other examples of LIS studies looking at tagging in wider contexts, Navarro Bullock et al (2018) discuss how effective tags are when accessing information; Samanta and Rath (2020) compare the usefulness of tags and controlled subject headings on LibraryThing and Szuban (2018) investigates a videogame wiki to appraise how the use of a folksonomy can complement the top-down work of a hierarchical structure. Sarkar and Bhattacharya (2020) give an excellent overview of comparative studies of folksonomies and controlled vocabularies within LIS.…”
Section: Literature Review and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For examples of research using network tag analysis, see Ahmed and Lugovic (2019), Buarki and Alkhateeb (2018), Ewbank (2015). For other examples of LIS studies looking at tagging in wider contexts, Navarro Bullock et al (2018) discuss how effective tags are when accessing information; Samanta and Rath (2020) compare the usefulness of tags and controlled subject headings on LibraryThing and Szuban (2018) investigates a videogame wiki to appraise how the use of a folksonomy can complement the top-down work of a hierarchical structure. Sarkar and Bhattacharya (2020) give an excellent overview of comparative studies of folksonomies and controlled vocabularies within LIS.…”
Section: Literature Review and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's about finding social information that responds to the user. We distinguish, for example, the information retrieval in blogs, microblogs [21,29] and the search for conversations [31]; 2) the second concerns the exploitation of social contents to improve IR, in which social information is used to improve the information retrieval process, for example, tags in folksonomies have been found useful for improving web search and personalized search [18], re-ranking of search results [9,17] and 3) the third paradigm concerns the search for information carried out by several people, collaborative search [44].…”
Section: Social Information Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%