2020
DOI: 10.3390/ani10101793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracies of Genomic Prediction for Growth Traits at Weaning and Yearling Ages in Yak

Abstract: Genomic selection is a promising breeding strategy that has been used in considerable numbers of breeding projects due to its highly accurate results. Yak are rare mammals that are remarkable because of their ability to survive in the extreme and harsh conditions predominantly at the so-called “roof of the world”—the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. In the current study, we conducted an exploration of the feasibility of genomic evaluation and compared the predictive accuracy of early growth traits with five different … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hayes et al [ 53 ] also found that the GBLUP and the BayesB methods resulted in similar accuracies in a multibreed dairy population. Additionally, Ostersen et al [ 54 ] reported no difference among the GBLUP, the Bayesian LASSO, and the Bayesian mixture methods based on 60,000 SNP data, and Ge et al [ 55 ] reported the similar predictive accuracy for the GBLUP and the Bayesian methods for growth traits at weaning and yearling ages in Yaks. Although the predictive abilities of the GBLUP and the Bayesian methods were quite similar for growth and carcass traits and k-means and random clusters ( Figure 5 and Figure 6 ) in the current study, the realized accuracies of the GEBV of the GBLUP and the Bayesian methods were not similar ( Figure 7 and Figure 8 ) because of the heritability estimates from the GBLUP and the Bayesian (BayesA, BayesB, BayesC and Lasso) methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hayes et al [ 53 ] also found that the GBLUP and the BayesB methods resulted in similar accuracies in a multibreed dairy population. Additionally, Ostersen et al [ 54 ] reported no difference among the GBLUP, the Bayesian LASSO, and the Bayesian mixture methods based on 60,000 SNP data, and Ge et al [ 55 ] reported the similar predictive accuracy for the GBLUP and the Bayesian methods for growth traits at weaning and yearling ages in Yaks. Although the predictive abilities of the GBLUP and the Bayesian methods were quite similar for growth and carcass traits and k-means and random clusters ( Figure 5 and Figure 6 ) in the current study, the realized accuracies of the GEBV of the GBLUP and the Bayesian methods were not similar ( Figure 7 and Figure 8 ) because of the heritability estimates from the GBLUP and the Bayesian (BayesA, BayesB, BayesC and Lasso) methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical model, marker density, LD, and sample size influenced on selection accuracy 43 . The accuracy of GEBVs for growth traits was reported 0.391 (GBLUP) and 0.379 (Bayes Lasso) in Yak 50 . Because of low samples size in this research, it was suggested to predict unbiased GEBVs using the associated SNPs from GWAS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic mechanism of yaks also shows differences between cattle and buffalo. Based on the GWAS results, the genomic predicted accuracy of BW, body size, and other traits is far lower than that found in cattle [ 29 ]. Many anticipated candidate genes were not detected in the GWAS results, indicating that alternative analyses, such as pathway analysis, are needed to identify whether genes associated with these candidates are detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%