2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate modeling of single-particle cryo-EM images quantitates the benefits expected from using Zernike phase contrast

Abstract: The use of a Zernike-type phase plate in biological cryo-electron microscopy allows the imaging, without using defocus, of what are predominantly phase objects. It is thought that such phase-plate implementations might result in higher quality images, free from the problems of CTF correction that occur when images must be recorded at extremely high values of defocus. In single-particle cryo-electron microscopy it is hoped that these improvements in image quality will facilitate work on structures that have pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gaussian noise N (0, σ 2 ε ) added, where σ ε = 40, 50, 60, so that the corresponding SNRs are 0.19, 0.12, 0.08, which reflect the low SNR nature of cryo-EM images. This procedure of simulating cryo-EM images is commonly used in the cryo-EM community [Chang et al (2010), Singer et al (2010), Sorzano et al (2010), Hall, Nogales and Glaeser (2011)]. To reflect the nature of the experiment, we consider two scenarios:…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaussian noise N (0, σ 2 ε ) added, where σ ε = 40, 50, 60, so that the corresponding SNRs are 0.19, 0.12, 0.08, which reflect the low SNR nature of cryo-EM images. This procedure of simulating cryo-EM images is commonly used in the cryo-EM community [Chang et al (2010), Singer et al (2010), Sorzano et al (2010), Hall, Nogales and Glaeser (2011)]. To reflect the nature of the experiment, we consider two scenarios:…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usefulness of in-focus TEM phase-plate imaging has long been appreciated, and has recently been affirmed (Malac et al, 2008; Chang et al, 2010; Hall et al, 2011), but practical problems with its implementation for “real-world” use have hindered widespread adoption (see reviews by Nagayama and Danev, 2009; Danev et al, 2009; Danev and Nagayama, 2010; Nagayama 2011). Nevertheless, the current state of development has enabled early applications to biological problems, validating the technical advantages of phase-plate imaging (Danev and Nagayama, 2008; Fukuda and Nagayama, 2012; Rochat et al, 2011; Hosogi et al, 2011; Danev et al, 2010; Murata et al, 2010; Shigematsu et al, 2010; Yui et al, 2008; Yamaguchi et al, 2008).…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent example is the use of a quantitative model of image formation to evaluate the potential of phase-contrast electron microscopy (Hall et al, 2011). Traditionally such simulations start with the placement of electron-scattering density according to the atomic coordinates of a protein molecule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to modeling protein solvation is to compute directly the average density and distribution of water molecules surrounding a protein by molecular dynamics (MD) simulation (Wang et al, 2008; Hall et al, 2011). Such calculations are however very time consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%