2021
DOI: 10.1002/mp.14811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive CaRdiac cOne BEAm computed Tomography (ACROBEAT): Developing the next generation of cardiac cone beam CT imaging

Abstract: An important factor when considering the use of interventional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging during cardiac procedures is the trade-off between imaging dose and image quality. Accordingly, Adaptive CaRdiac cOne BEAm computed Tomography (ACROBEAT) presents an alternative acquisition method, adapting the gantry velocity and projection rate of CBCT imaging systems in accordance with a patient's electrocardiogram (ECG) signal in real-time. The aim of this study was to experimentally investigate that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, there are a number of limitations to the experimental set up used to implement the continuous dual‐isocenter imaging trajectory. These limitations have also been noted in previous novel imaging trajectory investigations using the TACS 8,14,15 . First, there is a limit on how fast the C‐arm gantry can rotate when being controlled via the TACS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, there are a number of limitations to the experimental set up used to implement the continuous dual‐isocenter imaging trajectory. These limitations have also been noted in previous novel imaging trajectory investigations using the TACS 8,14,15 . First, there is a limit on how fast the C‐arm gantry can rotate when being controlled via the TACS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limitations have also been noted in previous novel imaging trajectory investigations using the TACS. 8,14,15 First, there is a limit on how fast the C-arm gantry can rotate when being controlled via the TACS. Clinically, the gantry of robotic CBCT imaging systems can rotate up to 45 • /s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies will look to quantify this effect and examine the possibility of integrating adaptive imaging strategies to mitigate physiological motion. 16,17 In addition, during future iterations of the multi-turn reverse helical scan where the gantry velocity can match that of current clinical 3D imaging (velocities >45 degrees/s, reducing the scan time to approximately 30 seconds), the possibility of acquiring images during breath hold to mitigate motion blur needs to be investigated. This is the first report of a continuous multi-turn reverse helical CBCT scan to image an animal specimen within the context of an interventional procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C-arm begins at the maximum right anterior oblique angle, allowing full angular range (400 degrees around the table) in every clockwise and anticlockwise rotation. During each rotation, the C-arm rotates at constant speed (20 degrees/s), currently limited by prototype control hardware 16,17 . Rotation speeds exceeding 45 degrees/s are common in clinical use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motion artifacts in the planning scans can propagate errors throughout the planning process from segmentation, guide development to 3D-printing. Future studies involving live animals will be used to quantify the extent of these errors and determine whether adaptive CBCT imaging approaches [26][27][28] are required to reduce the size and number of motion artifacts. Another limitation in the planning process of these studies was that the segmentation software (3D Slicer) used is not United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) approved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%