2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2013.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air data system fault modeling and detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main challenge in anomaly detection algorithm development is that sensor networks are highly application and domain dependent. Two domainspecific techniques are proposed by Yin et al [34] who model wind turbine data and Freeman et al [35] who model aircraft pilot-static probe data. Both of these examples propose anomaly detection techniques for data with a nonlinear and unknown distribution and significant measurement noise.…”
Section: Detection Of Corrupted Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenge in anomaly detection algorithm development is that sensor networks are highly application and domain dependent. Two domainspecific techniques are proposed by Yin et al [34] who model wind turbine data and Freeman et al [35] who model aircraft pilot-static probe data. Both of these examples propose anomaly detection techniques for data with a nonlinear and unknown distribution and significant measurement noise.…”
Section: Detection Of Corrupted Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,6 IMU and ADS FDD are both studied by a lot of researchers. 7,8,9 Most researchers use the aerodynamic model of the aircraft. However, the calculation of the aerodynamic forces and moments may contain uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this time, the incorrect measurements should be detected, identified and isolated to avoid its continuous propagation by using the previous faults self-detection methodology [8][9]. Further, some detailed faults information such as the type of faults is very needed, which can benefit the further device maintenance and can also be ready for latter data recovery under faults.…”
Section: Figure 1 Construction Models Of Svads Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete the signal decomposition of sample X by using EEMD and obtain seven IMFs called as IMF 1 , IMF 2 ,…, IMF 7 and a residual called as IMF 8 .…”
Section: Faults Features Extraction Based On Sensitive Imf Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%