Interactive problem-solving workshops provide a relatively confidential atmosphere in which members of societies engaged in protracted social conflict can examine and share their assumptions and perceptions about the conflict and think creatively about the possibilities for de-escalation. Two sorts of workshop goals have generally been articulated:(1) creating change in participants ' understanding, and (2) transferring participants' new ideas to political decision-making and public discussion. Although facilitators have tended to emphasize the role of the participants in generating and transferring new learning, this article expands our conceptions of change and transfer to include both participants and facilitators. A basic complementarity is postulated between the strengths and weaknesses of these two agents of transfer. If considered this way, the integrity of this confidential process-and thus of its potentially unique contributions to a peace process-can be maintained while increasing the opportunities for transfer.Interactive problem-solving workshops (IPSWs) (Kelman, 1972) originally called controlled communication (Burton, 1969), and now frequently referred to as interactive conflict resolution (Fisher, 1997), are off-record dialogues, convened by skilled facilitators (often academics), among members of societies engaged in protracted conflict. The intent of an IPSW is to enhance an understanding of the underlying needs and fears that maintain the conflict, to build working relationships across conflict lines, and to brainstorm steps to solutions that can be fed into a public peace process (Fisher, 1997;Montville, 1991;Saunders, 1999). The offrecord quality of these dialogues is perhaps the feature that most distinguishes this approach from other contributions to building peace. Participants agree not to hold