2010
DOI: 10.1177/030932471004500808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental and numerical investigation of the static and dynamic constitutive behaviour of aluminium alloys

Abstract: A split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) set-up was used to investigate the dynamic constitutive behaviour of commercial aluminium alloys both experimentally and numerically. The study was conducted in a 500–10 000 s×1 strain rate regime. Both regular solid and modified hollow transmission bars were employed in realizing this strain rate regime. Four different aluminium alloys, namely 7075-T4, 2024-T3, 6061-T6, and 5182-O, were considered for investigation. A copper-110 alloy pulse shaper was used to obtain bette… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It reveals that the influence of strain rate effects on the result of the explosion simulation, where expected strain rates are much higher than in case of this study may, in fact, be negligible. A similar conclusion may be drawn from Abotula and Chalivendra (2010). Nevertheless, these effects will be included in future quantitative analyses aiming at a higher accuracy of the outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…It reveals that the influence of strain rate effects on the result of the explosion simulation, where expected strain rates are much higher than in case of this study may, in fact, be negligible. A similar conclusion may be drawn from Abotula and Chalivendra (2010). Nevertheless, these effects will be included in future quantitative analyses aiming at a higher accuracy of the outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…As a rst attempt to keep things simple, a linear hardening model is selected. As a consequence, the model only involves the yield stress (σ y ) and the hardening modulus (H ) (12).…”
Section: Virtual Elds In Homogeneous Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2000; Li et al. , 2009; Abotula and Chalivendra, 2010) and torsional (Johnson et al. , 1983) experiments of the alloy AA2024-T3 (Barlat et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2001; Rasaee and Mirzaei, 2019) performed at different strain rates. Further, for numerical investigations, Johnson–Cook (JC) model (Johnson, 1983) is popularly used, for studying the strain rate-based deformation of AA2024 alloy (Abotula and Chalivendra, 2010; Rasaee and Mirzaei, 2019), due to its simplicity and easy evaluation of material constants involved. Apart from the JC model, Mechanical Threshold Stress (MTS) (Follansbee and Kocks, 1988) and Zerilli-Armstrong (ZA) (Zerilli and Armstrong, 1987) are among the alternative constitutive models used for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation