1993
DOI: 10.1080/01449299308924387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An instrument for the measurement of the visual quality of displays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In three experiments, in which different subjects participated, three monochrome flat panel displays were rated (an ELD, a reflective LCD and a back-lit LCD). The mean repeated measurements correlation of the DES items over these experiments was 0.848 [36].…”
Section: The Display Evaluation Scalementioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In three experiments, in which different subjects participated, three monochrome flat panel displays were rated (an ELD, a reflective LCD and a back-lit LCD). The mean repeated measurements correlation of the DES items over these experiments was 0.848 [36].…”
Section: The Display Evaluation Scalementioning
confidence: 87%
“…The inter-rater reliability [35], repeated measures reliability and validity have been studied. Interrater reliability coefficients were determined from five different experiments [36]. To give an indication: the mean correlation within subjects, between objects and collapsed over the DES items, was 0.809.…”
Section: The Display Evaluation Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjective measures used in the current study are based on previous research in Human -Computer Interaction (DES-W, based on [24]) and experimental aesthetics ( [21]). However, a broader range of subjective measures may be considered, such as [16] aesthetics scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a first rating task, participants completed a set of 30 (six items £ five screen ratios) questions (DES-W) based on the display evaluation scale (DES; [24]). These questions asked participants to rate their satisfaction with display quality in terms of the width of the navigation area and content area, the size of the navigation area and content area, and finally the combination of width of navigation area and content area and combination of size of navigation area and content area.…”
Section: Materials and Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%