2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-021-01954-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Interior Point-Proximal Method of Multipliers for Linear Positive Semi-Definite Programming

Abstract: In this paper we generalize the Interior Point-Proximal Method of Multipliers (IP-PMM) presented in Pougkakiotis and Gondzio (Comput Optim Appl 78:307–351, 2021. 10.1007/s10589-020-00240-9) for the solution of linear positive Semi-Definite Programming (SDP) problems, allowing inexactness in the solution of the associated Newton systems. In particular, we combine an infeasible Interior Point Method (IPM) with the Proximal Method of Multipliers (PMM) and interpret the algorithm (IP-PMM) as a primal-dual regulari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us now focus on the case of the regularized saddle point systems (and their respective normal equations) arising from the application of regularized IPMs on convex programming problems. The MATLAB code, which is based on the IP-PMM presented in [40,41], can be found on GitHub. 1 In all the presented experiments a 6-digit accurate solution is requested.…”
Section: Regularized Ipms: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let us now focus on the case of the regularized saddle point systems (and their respective normal equations) arising from the application of regularized IPMs on convex programming problems. The MATLAB code, which is based on the IP-PMM presented in [40,41], can be found on GitHub. 1 In all the presented experiments a 6-digit accurate solution is requested.…”
Section: Regularized Ipms: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the rest of this section, we assume that = ( ) = ( ) . This assumption is based on the developments in [40,41], where a polynomially convergent regularized IPM is derived for convex quadratic and linear positive semi-definite programming problems, respectively. Following [7], we could precondition the matrix M using the following matrix:…”
Section: Let Us Initially Focus On Linear Programming (Lp) Problems O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal PSO presentations are applied as a primary input in the IPA. Recently, IPA is used in the phase-field approach to brittle and ductile fracture 56 , power system observability 57 , multipliers for linear positive semi-definite programming 58 , simulation and optimization of dynamic flux balance analysis models 59 , fourth order singular systems 60 , multistage nonlinear nonconvex programs 61 and monotone weighted linear complementarity problems 62 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme was then utilized for the solution of linear programming problems in [35], and for lassoregularized problems in [34]. A similar primal-dual approach for ℓ 1 -regularized convex quadratic programming problems was developed and analyzed in our accompanying paper [39] and was shown to be especially efficient for the solution of elastic-net linear regression and L 1 -regularized partial differential equation constrained optimization problems. In fact, the proposed active set method developed in this work is a direct extension of the method given in [39], altered in a specific way so that it can efficiently handle most piecewise-linear terms that appear in practice, via restricting its memory requirements.Indeed, we showcase that each of the nonsmooth terms in the objective of (P) can be utilized for reducing the memory requirements of the proposed method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%