2006
DOI: 10.1121/1.2335573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation into the effects of underwater piling noise on salmonids

Abstract: Underwater piling was undertaken in 2003 in Southampton Water on the South Coast of England. Monitoring was simultaneously undertaken of the waterborne sound from impact and vibropiling and its effects on brown trout in cages at increasing distances from the piling. Brown trout (Salmo trutta) were used as a model for salmon (Salmo salar), which were the species of interest but were not readily available. No obvious signs of trauma that could be attributed to sound exposure were found in any fish examined, from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different species can perceived a specific sound in different ways [14]. There are studies that have examined how pile driving and offshore wind affects fish, both their behavior and physical well being [15][16][17][18]. The results from these studies are difficult to apply to other sound sources, as they may differ in amplitude, frequency range and duration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different species can perceived a specific sound in different ways [14]. There are studies that have examined how pile driving and offshore wind affects fish, both their behavior and physical well being [15][16][17][18]. The results from these studies are difficult to apply to other sound sources, as they may differ in amplitude, frequency range and duration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, such weighted thresholds for marine mammals were obtained using auditory weighting functions based on the audiogram (e.g. Nedwell et al, 2006;Verboom and Kastelein, 2005) or the approximate frequency bandwidth of hearing (M-weighting) (Southall et al, 2007), but these two methods often produce very different weighted levels (e.g. De Jong and Ainslie, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underwater sound has previously been identified as a concern for potential negative impacts to fishes and other marine organisms but has primarily been linked to high-intensity sounds from seismic surveys, pile-driving, or military sonar (Richardson et al, 1995;Woods et al, 2001;Popper, 2003;Popper et al, 2005;Popper et al, 2006;Nedwell et al, 2006;Popper et al, 2007;Ruggerone et al, 2008;Popper and Hastings, 2009;Mueller-Blenkle et al, 2010). Woods et al (2001) examined fishes that died as a result of exposure to underwater sounds from pile-driving operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%