2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/vtcspring.2017.8108458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Unsupervised-Learning-Based Method for Multi-Hop Wireless Broadcast Relay Selection in Urban Vehicular Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important research field for new generation wireless networks is how to allocate resources between different users; in [32], it is suggested to use ANN for proactive resource allocation. In [33], an unsupervised learning based relay selection method is introduced for multi-hop networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important research field for new generation wireless networks is how to allocate resources between different users; in [32], it is suggested to use ANN for proactive resource allocation. In [33], an unsupervised learning based relay selection method is introduced for multi-hop networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proved that their learning algorithm outperformed the energy vector-based algorithm. Song et al [58], discussed how k-means clustering and its classification capabilities can aid in the selection of an efficient relay node for urban vehicular networks. The authors investigated different methods for multi-hop wireless broadcasting and how k-means can be a key factor in the decision-making of the BSs, by learning from the distribution of the devices and choosing automatically which is the most suitable device to be used as a relay.…”
Section: B Unsupervised Learning In 5g Mobile and Wireless Communications Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Unsupervised Learning focuses, in general, on clustering: the corresponding models are efficient in user grouping, BS or RN selection and QoS levels formulation, concerning RRM tasks [88]- [92].…”
Section: F Summary -Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, accuracy is the sum of True Positive (TP) and True Negative (TN) predictions, divided by the number of the total predictions (TP + TN + False Positive (FP) + False Negative (FN)). Then, F1-score is given by the following formula: [83], [84], [85], [86], [87] Unsupervised Learning RN or BS selection unsupervised k-NN, k-Means clustering variations [88] Unsupervised Learning user grouping, clustering, handover management k-NN, k-Means, Agg-GNN, f-test [89], [90], [91], [92] Reinforcement Learning subcarrier allocation, power control, frequency selection MDP, DRL, Water-Filling, WMMSE [93]. [94], [95], [96], [97] Reinforcement Learning minimization of difference between requested and active KPIs (throughput, SNIR, CSI)…”
Section: Simulations and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%