2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyses of cancer incidence and other morbidities in gamma irradiated B6CF1 mice

Abstract: With increasing medical radiation exposures, it is important to understand how different modes of delivery of ionizing radiation as well as total doses of exposure impact health outcomes. Our lab studied the risks associated with ionizing radiation by analyzing the Northwestern University Radiation Archive for animals (NURA). NURA contains detailed data from a series of 10 individual neutron and gamma irradiation experiments conducted on over 50,000 mice. Rigorous statistical testing on control mice from all J… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(79 reference statements)
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing the age at death for aged mice compared to mice first irradiated around 100 days, there was a noticeable increase in longevity in the aged irradiated mice. No equivalent finding was noted in the gamma irradiated young and old mice cohorts ( Fig 1C and [ 14 ]). We excluded the aged irradiated mice from our main analysis because none of the sham irradiated animals in our cohort were aged before sham exposure and this small subset of data would have had a large amount of leverage on our model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When comparing the age at death for aged mice compared to mice first irradiated around 100 days, there was a noticeable increase in longevity in the aged irradiated mice. No equivalent finding was noted in the gamma irradiated young and old mice cohorts ( Fig 1C and [ 14 ]). We excluded the aged irradiated mice from our main analysis because none of the sham irradiated animals in our cohort were aged before sham exposure and this small subset of data would have had a large amount of leverage on our model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The results in S2 Table in S1 File show similar results to the main model. Model output showed that the integrated and penalized log likelihoods were very similar and both significant (p-value < 0.001), increasing our confidence that the control experiments outlined in our previous paper [ 14 ] were sufficient for capturing variability between experiments. Finally, we used Kaplan Meier survival curves to validate the proportional hazards assumption in our model and found non-overlapping survival curves between sham irradiated mice that received acute and fractionated exposures ( S1E Fig in S1 File ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations