2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10657-011-9258-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of relationship between efficiency of justice services and salaries of judges with two-stage DEA method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
32
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the different work contents and roles that are played by the staff at the courts of first instance, we decided to use two input variables capturing the two main categories of staff that operate at a court level: judges (input 1) and support staff (input 2). This definition of inputs is consistent with previous research [30,33,35,37].…”
Section: The Dea Modelsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the different work contents and roles that are played by the staff at the courts of first instance, we decided to use two input variables capturing the two main categories of staff that operate at a court level: judges (input 1) and support staff (input 2). This definition of inputs is consistent with previous research [30,33,35,37].…”
Section: The Dea Modelsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There have also been some documented applications of DEA in the justice area. For example, it has been used to assess the efficiency of police forces [24][25][26][27][28] and prosecutor offices [29], and to determine the relationship between efficiency of justice services and salaries of judges in European countries [30].…”
Section: Dea and Its Use To Assess The Efficiency Of Courtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peyrache and Zago (2016) analyzed the efficiency of Italian courts of law in [2003][2004][2005][2006][2007][2008], pointing out that technical inefficiency is about 40% of total inefficiency, court size is 25% and inefficiency of re-allocation is about 35%, suggesting that the adoption of best practices can increase efficiency. Although some research focuses only on the productivity of judges (Deyneli, 2012;Schneider, 2005) and the present study differentiates between own and outsourced human capital. These works discuss performance differences related to educational level, age, experience, and wages.…”
Section: Causal Relationship Between Amount Of Human Capital and Prodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The number of articles published on the topic in the journal is quite extensive and, as written, at an increasing pace. For giving a insight of it we may cite here to a few of them since Tullock (1994) on court errors, Benson (1999) on the decision to arbitrate or to litigate, van Wijck and van Velthoven (2000) on American rule versus British rule in litigation, Fon et al (2005) on the impact on legal change, Schneider (2005) focusing on judges productivity, Cassone and Ramello (2011) on the economics of class action litigation and Calabresi and Schwartz (2011) on their cost, Di Vita (2012) on administrative disputes and Deybeli (2012) focusing on the technical efficiency of the European Judicial system. However for a more complete overview we must let the reader to conduct a more extensive exploration of the journal pages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%