2017
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201700865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anion Layering and Steric Hydration Repulsion on Positively Charged Surfaces in Aqueous Electrolytes

Abstract: The molecular structure at charged solid/liquid interfaces is vital for many chemical or electrochemical processes, such as adhesion, catalysis, or the stability of colloidal dispersions. How cations influence structural hydration forces and interactions across negatively charged surfaces has been studied in great detail. However, how anions influence structural hydration forces on positively charged surfaces is much less understood. Herein we report force versus distance profiles on freshly cleaved mica using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In symmetric systems, short-ranged repulsive non-DLVO forces are omnipresent for strongly hydrated and highly charged mineral surfaces, such as mica, silica, and metal oxides [70,78,[125][126][127][128]. The range of these forces is normally small, typically below one nanometer.…”
Section: Repulsive Non-dlvo Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In symmetric systems, short-ranged repulsive non-DLVO forces are omnipresent for strongly hydrated and highly charged mineral surfaces, such as mica, silica, and metal oxides [70,78,[125][126][127][128]. The range of these forces is normally small, typically below one nanometer.…”
Section: Repulsive Non-dlvo Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of water, the relative hydration energies of the two monoanions seem instead to be the dominating factor. Assuming monoanions of inorganic carbonate 35 and phosphate 36 as estimates (HCO 3 = −380 kJ/mol; H 2 PO 4 = −522 kJ/mol), BA is less strongly hydrated than PPA, for which the strong hydration will prevent its interaction with the binding site.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point of zero zeta potential obtained via high to low pH titration was reported to be located at pH 4.2 (Nosrati et al, 2009). Hu et al, (2017) also report that at pH ∼ 3, which was measured for a 50 mM solution, the surface of mica surface is close to its point of zero charge pH. Since Jafari &Jung (2018) measured contacts angle on the smooth basal plane, our calculated value of 3.64, which is 0.56 pH unit lower for one molar sodium chloride solution is theoretically and experimentally meaningful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Jafari &Jung (2018) measured contacts angle on the smooth basal plane, our calculated value of 3.64, which is 0.56 pH unit lower for one molar sodium chloride solution is theoretically and experimentally meaningful. Moreover, at pH approximately equal to 3, the surface of mica is close to its point of zero charge pH (Hu et al, 2017;Kristiensen et al, 2011). Therefore, the closeness of our calculated point of zero charge pH of mica using in situ experimental data and Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%