Anterior Cantilever Resin‐Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Review of the Literature

Mourshed, Bilal; Samran, Abdulaziz; Alfagih, Amal; Samran, Ahalm; Abdulrab, Saleem; Kern, Matthias

doi:10.1111/jopr.12555

Cited by 55 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A recently published review by Mourshed et al included studies with a follow‐up time of 2.5 years, and this review was only conducted to look at the single‐retainer anterior RBFPDs. No analyses or statistical tests were applied in that review . Wei et al in their review included 5 studies with a minimum follow‐up time of 2 years.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Five‐year success rate of resin‐bonded fixed partial dentures: A systematic review

Alraheam

Ngoc

Wiesen

et al. 2018

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To assess and compare the 5‐year success rate of resin‐bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) fabricated from different materials. Methods An electronic search on 3 databases from January 1965 to March of 2017 was done for human randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and prospective and retrospective cohort studies. The key words used in the search were: Bridge OR bridges OR fixed partial OR fixed dental AND resin bonded OR Maryland OR ceramic bonded. Quality assessment was done using the Newcastle‐Ottawa scale. Success was defined as the RBFPDs remaining in situ and not having experienced debonding, biological failures, or mechanical failures at the examination visit. Results Meta analyses of the included studies showed an estimated 5‐year success rate of 88.18% for the metal framework RBFPDs and 84.41% for the nonmetal framework RBFPDs. The estimated 5‐year success rate for each nonmetal material category was 92.07% for zirconia, 94.26% for In‐Ceram alumina, and 84.83% for fiber‐reinforced composite. The failure rate was not statistically significant among the single, double, and multiple retainers RBFPDs (P > .05). Technical complications were the main reason for failures. Conclusion The 5‐year clinical performance of RBFPDs is similar to the performance of conventional fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and implant‐supported crowns. Clinical Significance Clinicians should consider using RBFPDs more often because their clinical performance is similar to the performance of conventional FPDs and implant‐supported crowns.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This study found that cantilevered RBFPDs showed promising results with high survival rates. No analysis was done in this review …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Five‐year success rate of resin‐bonded fixed partial dentures: A systematic review

Alraheam

Ngoc

Wiesen

et al. 2018

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The rationale of the present review is to report all different designs and clinical procedures together with clinical survival rates of all‐ceramic RBFDPs in the anterior region. None of the previously published reviews in the literature mentioned all of these details for all‐ceramic RBFDPs in the anterior region …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical procedures, designs, and survival rates of all‐ceramic resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses in the anterior region: A systematic review

Tezulaş

Yıldız

Evren

et al. 2018

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indications, designs, abutment teeth preparation, provisionalization, try-in, surface treatment options, and cementation of the all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses are described in this article. Clinical survival rates are also given in detail, so that clinicians can easily compare the current studies and give their own decision about all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses in the anterior region.

show abstract

“…In 2016, Wei et al conducted a meta‐analysis to investigate the influence of framework designs on clinical performance of anterior RBFDPs, and demonstrated that cantilever RBFDPs had lower clinical failure rates than two‐retainer RBFDPs did. More recently, Mourshed et al reviewed the clinical outcomes of anterior cantilever RBFDPs made from metal‐ceramic or all‐ceramic materials, but a systematic literature search combined with statistical data synthesis was not performed. Additionally, to present the reliable bonding methods to oxide ceramic restorations, Kern summarized numbers of published clinical trials on all‐ceramic RBFDPs and inlay‐retained FDPs, which mainly focused on the bonding treatments and debonding rates of the included studies.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of the Survival and Complication Rates of All‐Ceramic Resin‐Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses

Chen

Cai

Ren

et al. 2017

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Anterior Cantilever Resin‐Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Review of the Literature

Abstract: The use of cantilever RBFDPs showed promising results and high survival rates.

Cited by 55 publications

References 35 publications

Five‐year success rate of resin‐bonded fixed partial dentures: A systematic review

Five‐year success rate of resin‐bonded fixed partial dentures: A systematic review

Clinical procedures, designs, and survival rates of all‐ceramic resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses in the anterior region: A systematic review

A Systematic Review of the Survival and Complication Rates of All‐Ceramic Resin‐Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About