Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activities of Crude Extract of Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae IBRL OS-64 against Foodborne Bacterium, Yersinia enterocolitica

Abstract

The antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of crude extract of Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae IBRL OS-64 was studied and tested against a foodborne pathogenic bacterium, Yersinia enterocolitica. The ethyl acetate extract exhibited favorable antibacterial activity with the zone of inhibition was 20.3±0.6 mm compared to dichloromethane (15.0±0.3 mm) and butanol (9.0±0.3 mm) extracts. Minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values of the extract were 125 and 250 µg/mL, respectively. Structural degeneration studies through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) micrographs exhibited major abnormalities that occurred on the bacterial cells after exposure to the extract were complete alterations in their morphology and collapsed of the cells beyond repair. The findings showed that the extract possesses antibiofilm activity against the initial and preformed biofilm of Y. enterocolitica with the highest inhibition value of 69.12% and 58.70%, respectively. The results also revealed the initial biofilm was more susceptible to the extract as compared to pre-formed biofilm. The light microscopy (LM) and SEM photomicrographs proved that the fungal extract significantly eliminates extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) matrices and hinder the attachment of the bacterial cells for biofilm formation. Therefore, the current study suggested the ethyl acetate crude extract from an endophytic fungus, L. pseudotheobromae IBRL OS-64 may be an effective antibacterial and anti-biofilm agent to treat foodborne pathogens.

Anti-Biofilm, Antibacterial, and Anti-Quorum Sensing Activities of Selected South African Plants Traditionally Used to Treat Diarrhoea

“…This could be due to the ability of plant extracts to curtail binding forces that promote cell attachments as suggested by [ 43 ]. According to a report by Taufiq and Darah [ 44 ], the negative value suggests that the bacteria reacted to the change in the environment, consequently producing a large amount of biofilm to annul the effect of the perceived unfavourable environmental condition. In addition, it is also suggested that the difficulty in total eradication of biofilm is because the consortium of microbial growth is formed by the interaction of multiple species.…”