2017
DOI: 10.14419/ijpr.v5i1.7564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assesment and evaluation of excess lifetime cancer risk for Occupants of university of Uyo permanent campus, Nigeria

Abstract: This paper presents the results of ambient radioactive radiation, radiation health hazard indices and excess lifetime cancer risk estimation within University of Uyo campus, Use Offot, Uyo, Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Mean annual outdoor and indoor equivalent doses of 0.284mSv/yr. and 0.854mSv/yr. respectively were recorded, being less than 1mSv/yr. maximum recommended limit for general public. Mean annual outdoor and indoor effective doses of 0.174mSv/yr. and 0.645mSv/yr. respectively with a total of 0.819… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sunday et al [11] It was determined that 2.86 × 10 −3 is the excessive lifetime cancer risk factor for the research location. that is more than the global average.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sunday et al [11] It was determined that 2.86 × 10 −3 is the excessive lifetime cancer risk factor for the research location. that is more than the global average.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because they are probabilistic and presume that any exposure can have an effect, these effects are referred to as stochastic effects [6]. The presence of rock materials and other building materials coupled with laboratory chemicals may influence the background radiation of the environment [11]. The current study's goal is to establish baseline data for future radiation effect assessments and, if necessary, radiation protection measures by measuring dose rates in order to assess health hazards, if any, and compare equivalent doses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%